彭博社和GameStop传奇:对股市民主的恐惧

IF 4 2区社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Economy and Society Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1080/03085147.2023.2189819

Tom Duterme

{"title":"彭博社和GameStop传奇:对股市民主的恐惧","authors":"Tom Duterme","doi":"10.1080/03085147.2023.2189819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The GameStop saga aroused the emotion and indignation of a large part of the financial community. This paper accounts for this reaction by exposing the conflict of expertise at the heart of the saga: the Bloomberg Terminal of market professionals and the forum of retail investors supported antagonistic perceptions of events. It then generalizes these findings by characterizing the framing operated by the Terminal mobilized by traders, and by underlining its essential divergences from the framing of the internet forum. Through their selection, weighting and ranking operations, these devices offer different points of view on the financial markets. This pluralization of the informational bases guiding investors’ decisions allows this paper to address the issue of the democratization of finance, its conditions of feasibility and desirability.","PeriodicalId":48030,"journal":{"name":"Economy and Society","volume":"54 1","pages":"373 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bloomberg and the GameStop saga: The fear of stock market democracy\",\"authors\":\"Tom Duterme\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03085147.2023.2189819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The GameStop saga aroused the emotion and indignation of a large part of the financial community. This paper accounts for this reaction by exposing the conflict of expertise at the heart of the saga: the Bloomberg Terminal of market professionals and the forum of retail investors supported antagonistic perceptions of events. It then generalizes these findings by characterizing the framing operated by the Terminal mobilized by traders, and by underlining its essential divergences from the framing of the internet forum. Through their selection, weighting and ranking operations, these devices offer different points of view on the financial markets. This pluralization of the informational bases guiding investors’ decisions allows this paper to address the issue of the democratization of finance, its conditions of feasibility and desirability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economy and Society\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"373 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2023.2189819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2023.2189819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

GameStop事件引起了金融界很大一部分人的情绪和愤慨。本文通过揭示事件核心的专业知识冲突来解释这种反应:市场专业人士的彭博终端(Bloomberg Terminal)和散户投资者论坛支持对事件的对立看法。然后，通过描述由交易者动员的终端操作的框架，并强调其与互联网论坛框架的本质差异，概括了这些发现。通过它们的选择、加权和排名操作，这些工具提供了对金融市场的不同观点。这种指导投资者决策的信息基础的多元化使本文能够解决金融民主化的问题，其可行性和可取性的条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bloomberg and the GameStop saga: The fear of stock market democracy

Abstract The GameStop saga aroused the emotion and indignation of a large part of the financial community. This paper accounts for this reaction by exposing the conflict of expertise at the heart of the saga: the Bloomberg Terminal of market professionals and the forum of retail investors supported antagonistic perceptions of events. It then generalizes these findings by characterizing the framing operated by the Terminal mobilized by traders, and by underlining its essential divergences from the framing of the internet forum. Through their selection, weighting and ranking operations, these devices offer different points of view on the financial markets. This pluralization of the informational bases guiding investors’ decisions allows this paper to address the issue of the democratization of finance, its conditions of feasibility and desirability.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economy and Society Multiple-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： This radical interdisciplinary journal of theory and politics continues to be one of the most exciting and influential resources for scholars in the social sciences worldwide. As one of the field"s leading scholarly refereed journals, Economy and Society plays a key role in promoting new debates and currents of social thought. For 37 years, the journal has explored the social sciences in the broadest interdisciplinary sense, in innovative articles from some of the world"s leading sociologists and anthropologists, political scientists, legal theorists, philosophers, economists and other renowned scholars.