澳大利亚煤与神华煤制备的水煤浆性能的比较研究

Yun Zengjie , Wu Guoguang , Meng Xianliang , Zhang Yuliang , Shi Frank , He Yaqun , Luo Xiaoqiang
{"title":"澳大利亚煤与神华煤制备的水煤浆性能的比较研究","authors":"Yun Zengjie ,&nbsp;Wu Guoguang ,&nbsp;Meng Xianliang ,&nbsp;Zhang Yuliang ,&nbsp;Shi Frank ,&nbsp;He Yaqun ,&nbsp;Luo Xiaoqiang","doi":"10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two coal samples of similar rank were chosen from Australia and China to investigate the differences in Coal–Water Slurry (CWS) made from them. The effect of ash content and particle size gradation on these properties was also studied. Different grinding times were used when grinding the two coals and particle size analysis of these ground coals was used to select samples with a “double-peak” particle size distribution. All the “double-peak” samples were used to prepare a CWS. The concentration, viscosity, fluidity, and stability of each CWS were measured. The results show that the properties of a CWS prepared from a coal sample with a “double-peak” size distribution are better than those CWS prepared from samples with a mono-modal particle distribution. The ash content of Australian coal is 21.72% higher than the ash content of Shenhua coal. The highest coal concentration in slurry from the Australia coal is 11.01% higher than in CWS from the Shenhua coal. The fluidity and stability of the CWS prepared from the Australian coal are both better than the fluidity and stability of slurry prepared from Shenhua coal. High ash content in the Australian coal improves the pulping results of a CWS made from it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100930,"journal":{"name":"Mining Science and Technology (China)","volume":"21 3","pages":"Pages 343-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.014","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative investigation of the properties of coal–water slurries prepared from Australia and Shenhua coals\",\"authors\":\"Yun Zengjie ,&nbsp;Wu Guoguang ,&nbsp;Meng Xianliang ,&nbsp;Zhang Yuliang ,&nbsp;Shi Frank ,&nbsp;He Yaqun ,&nbsp;Luo Xiaoqiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two coal samples of similar rank were chosen from Australia and China to investigate the differences in Coal–Water Slurry (CWS) made from them. The effect of ash content and particle size gradation on these properties was also studied. Different grinding times were used when grinding the two coals and particle size analysis of these ground coals was used to select samples with a “double-peak” particle size distribution. All the “double-peak” samples were used to prepare a CWS. The concentration, viscosity, fluidity, and stability of each CWS were measured. The results show that the properties of a CWS prepared from a coal sample with a “double-peak” size distribution are better than those CWS prepared from samples with a mono-modal particle distribution. The ash content of Australian coal is 21.72% higher than the ash content of Shenhua coal. The highest coal concentration in slurry from the Australia coal is 11.01% higher than in CWS from the Shenhua coal. The fluidity and stability of the CWS prepared from the Australian coal are both better than the fluidity and stability of slurry prepared from Shenhua coal. High ash content in the Australian coal improves the pulping results of a CWS made from it.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mining Science and Technology (China)\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 343-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.014\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mining Science and Technology (China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674526411000603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Science and Technology (China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674526411000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

从澳大利亚和中国选取了两个等级相近的煤样,研究了由它们制成的水煤浆(CWS)的差异。还研究了灰分含量和粒度级配对这些性能的影响。在对两种煤进行磨矿时,采用不同的磨矿时间,通过对这两种煤的粒度分析,选择出具有“双峰”粒度分布的样品。所有“双峰”样品均用于制备CWS。测定了每种水煤浆的浓度、粘度、流动性和稳定性。结果表明,粒径呈“双峰”分布的煤样制备的水煤浆性能优于粒径呈单峰分布的煤样制备的水煤浆。澳大利亚煤的灰分比神华煤的灰分高21.72%。澳大利亚煤浆中煤的最高浓度比神华煤的水煤浆高11.01%。澳大利亚煤制水煤浆的流动性和稳定性均优于神华煤制水煤浆的流动性和稳定性。澳大利亚煤的高灰分含量改善了由其制成的水煤浆的制浆效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative investigation of the properties of coal–water slurries prepared from Australia and Shenhua coals

Two coal samples of similar rank were chosen from Australia and China to investigate the differences in Coal–Water Slurry (CWS) made from them. The effect of ash content and particle size gradation on these properties was also studied. Different grinding times were used when grinding the two coals and particle size analysis of these ground coals was used to select samples with a “double-peak” particle size distribution. All the “double-peak” samples were used to prepare a CWS. The concentration, viscosity, fluidity, and stability of each CWS were measured. The results show that the properties of a CWS prepared from a coal sample with a “double-peak” size distribution are better than those CWS prepared from samples with a mono-modal particle distribution. The ash content of Australian coal is 21.72% higher than the ash content of Shenhua coal. The highest coal concentration in slurry from the Australia coal is 11.01% higher than in CWS from the Shenhua coal. The fluidity and stability of the CWS prepared from the Australian coal are both better than the fluidity and stability of slurry prepared from Shenhua coal. High ash content in the Australian coal improves the pulping results of a CWS made from it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信