香芹酚对嗜酸乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌抑菌活性的体外研究

Kiana Safa Larijani, Ali Akbar Moghhaddam Nia, Atefeh Bozorgi Makrani, Mohaddesseh AbouHosseini Tabari, E. Khodadadi
{"title":"香芹酚对嗜酸乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌抑菌活性的体外研究","authors":"Kiana Safa Larijani, Ali Akbar Moghhaddam Nia, Atefeh Bozorgi Makrani, Mohaddesseh AbouHosseini Tabari, E. Khodadadi","doi":"10.52547/rabms.7.4.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims : Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) and Lactobacillus casei L. casei) are the primary bacterial pathogens involved in dental caries and periodontal diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol in inhibiting the growth of these two microbial species in-vitro. Materials & Methods : In this study, we prepared standard colonies of L. acidophilus and L. casei , then evaluated disk diffusion and well diffusion tests on De Man-Rugose and Sharpe (MRS) agar plates to determine the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol. We used 30 µg tetracycline disks as control. To evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Carvacrol was used in the range of 20 to 0.039 µL in MRS broth medium containing bacteria. To determine the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), the contents of tubes were subsequently cultured on MRS agar plates. Results : The MIC and MBC of Carvacrol against L. casei were 0.406 ± 0.143 and 0.813 ± 0.287 µg/mL, and against L. acidophilus were 0.254 ± 0.072 and 0.406 ± 0.143 µg/mL, respectively. In the disk diffusion test, carvacrol solution (2%) significantly induced inhibitory zones against L. casei and L. acidophilus . Although In the well diffusion test, 2% carvacrol solution generated inhibitory zones against L. casei . and against L. acidophilus with detectableinhibitory zones, but they werer not statistically significant.. We noted a significant difference only for the volume of 80 µL of solution (p = 0.03). Conclusion : The present study indicated that Carvacrol could be used as a natural alternative agent against L. acidophilus and L. casei generated dental caries.","PeriodicalId":16970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Activity of Carvacrol against Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, An In-Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Kiana Safa Larijani, Ali Akbar Moghhaddam Nia, Atefeh Bozorgi Makrani, Mohaddesseh AbouHosseini Tabari, E. Khodadadi\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/rabms.7.4.172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aims : Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) and Lactobacillus casei L. casei) are the primary bacterial pathogens involved in dental caries and periodontal diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol in inhibiting the growth of these two microbial species in-vitro. Materials & Methods : In this study, we prepared standard colonies of L. acidophilus and L. casei , then evaluated disk diffusion and well diffusion tests on De Man-Rugose and Sharpe (MRS) agar plates to determine the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol. We used 30 µg tetracycline disks as control. To evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Carvacrol was used in the range of 20 to 0.039 µL in MRS broth medium containing bacteria. To determine the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), the contents of tubes were subsequently cultured on MRS agar plates. Results : The MIC and MBC of Carvacrol against L. casei were 0.406 ± 0.143 and 0.813 ± 0.287 µg/mL, and against L. acidophilus were 0.254 ± 0.072 and 0.406 ± 0.143 µg/mL, respectively. In the disk diffusion test, carvacrol solution (2%) significantly induced inhibitory zones against L. casei and L. acidophilus . Although In the well diffusion test, 2% carvacrol solution generated inhibitory zones against L. casei . and against L. acidophilus with detectableinhibitory zones, but they werer not statistically significant.. We noted a significant difference only for the volume of 80 µL of solution (p = 0.03). Conclusion : The present study indicated that Carvacrol could be used as a natural alternative agent against L. acidophilus and L. casei generated dental caries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/rabms.7.4.172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rabms.7.4.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:嗜酸乳杆菌(Lactobacillus acidophilus)和干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus casei L. casei)是引起龋齿和牙周病的主要病原菌。在本研究中,我们旨在研究香芹酚在体外抑制这两种微生物生长的抑菌活性。材料与方法:制备了嗜酸乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌的标准菌落,并在De Man-Rugose和Sharpe (MRS)琼脂平板上进行了圆盘扩散和孔扩散试验,以测定Carvacrol的抑菌活性。以30µg四环素片为对照。为了评估最小抑制浓度(MIC), Carvacrol在含有细菌的MRS肉汤培养基中使用20 ~ 0.039µL。为了确定最低杀菌浓度(MBC),试管内容物随后在MRS琼脂板上培养。结果:Carvacrol对干酪乳杆菌的MIC和MBC分别为0.406±0.143和0.813±0.287µg/mL,对嗜酸乳杆菌的MIC和MBC分别为0.254±0.072和0.406±0.143µg/mL。在圆盘扩散试验中,2%的香芹酚溶液对干酪乳杆菌和嗜酸乳杆菌有明显的抑制区。虽然在孔扩散试验中,2%的香芹酚溶液对干酪乳杆菌产生了抑制带。对嗜酸乳杆菌均可检测到抑菌带,但差异无统计学意义。我们注意到只有80µL溶液的体积有显著差异(p = 0.03)。结论:香芹酚可作为防治嗜酸乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌所致龋病的天然替代剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Activity of Carvacrol against Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, An In-Vitro Study
Background & Aims : Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) and Lactobacillus casei L. casei) are the primary bacterial pathogens involved in dental caries and periodontal diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol in inhibiting the growth of these two microbial species in-vitro. Materials & Methods : In this study, we prepared standard colonies of L. acidophilus and L. casei , then evaluated disk diffusion and well diffusion tests on De Man-Rugose and Sharpe (MRS) agar plates to determine the antimicrobial activity of Carvacrol. We used 30 µg tetracycline disks as control. To evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Carvacrol was used in the range of 20 to 0.039 µL in MRS broth medium containing bacteria. To determine the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), the contents of tubes were subsequently cultured on MRS agar plates. Results : The MIC and MBC of Carvacrol against L. casei were 0.406 ± 0.143 and 0.813 ± 0.287 µg/mL, and against L. acidophilus were 0.254 ± 0.072 and 0.406 ± 0.143 µg/mL, respectively. In the disk diffusion test, carvacrol solution (2%) significantly induced inhibitory zones against L. casei and L. acidophilus . Although In the well diffusion test, 2% carvacrol solution generated inhibitory zones against L. casei . and against L. acidophilus with detectableinhibitory zones, but they werer not statistically significant.. We noted a significant difference only for the volume of 80 µL of solution (p = 0.03). Conclusion : The present study indicated that Carvacrol could be used as a natural alternative agent against L. acidophilus and L. casei generated dental caries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信