被资助者的生存:创业公司寿命和成功的计量经济学分析

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Daniel Keogh, Daniel K.N. Johnson
{"title":"被资助者的生存:创业公司寿命和成功的计量经济学分析","authors":"Daniel Keogh, Daniel K.N. Johnson","doi":"10.7341/20211742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: The existing literature on the success of startup enterprises is thorough in investigating individual factors, but relatively weak in testing those factors in combination. This research tests for interactive effects, i.e., complementarities, between those factors. METHODOLOGY: We use a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate longevity in startups, supplementing it with maximum likelihood estimation of two metrics of success (employment and revenue). In each model, we explicitly test for interactions between terms, thus advancing the literature. FINDINGS: Panel data analysis shows that financing strategy matters to startup success, especially when combined with specific human and social capital attributes of the founders. For example, angel investors and venture capital investors benefit differently from founders with industry experience; founders with higher educational achievement generate more revenue than their peers specifically when their startups collaborate in university partnerships. IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND PRACTICE: The paper suggests specific ways in which entrepreneurs should think about financing options that are complementary with their founder attributes. Further, it suggests that the literature must be very thoughtful, not only about the indicators of success but about advice to policymakers, financiers and entrepreneurs because of the nuanced nonlinearities and interactions we demonstrate. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: We contribute to the literature on startup financing with a large dataset, careful modelling of interactive complementarities of between inputs, correction of the potential sample selection bias in previous studies, and a suite of modelled outcomes (survival, employment, and revenue) which allow for nuanced results.","PeriodicalId":44596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival of the funded: Econometric analysis of startup longevity and success\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Keogh, Daniel K.N. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.7341/20211742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: The existing literature on the success of startup enterprises is thorough in investigating individual factors, but relatively weak in testing those factors in combination. This research tests for interactive effects, i.e., complementarities, between those factors. METHODOLOGY: We use a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate longevity in startups, supplementing it with maximum likelihood estimation of two metrics of success (employment and revenue). In each model, we explicitly test for interactions between terms, thus advancing the literature. FINDINGS: Panel data analysis shows that financing strategy matters to startup success, especially when combined with specific human and social capital attributes of the founders. For example, angel investors and venture capital investors benefit differently from founders with industry experience; founders with higher educational achievement generate more revenue than their peers specifically when their startups collaborate in university partnerships. IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND PRACTICE: The paper suggests specific ways in which entrepreneurs should think about financing options that are complementary with their founder attributes. Further, it suggests that the literature must be very thoughtful, not only about the indicators of success but about advice to policymakers, financiers and entrepreneurs because of the nuanced nonlinearities and interactions we demonstrate. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: We contribute to the literature on startup financing with a large dataset, careful modelling of interactive complementarities of between inputs, correction of the potential sample selection bias in previous studies, and a suite of modelled outcomes (survival, employment, and revenue) which allow for nuanced results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7341/20211742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7341/20211742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:现有的关于创业企业成功的文献对个体因素的考察比较深入,但对这些因素的组合检验相对较弱。这项研究检验了这些因素之间的相互作用,即互补性。方法:我们使用Cox比例风险模型来估计创业公司的寿命,并辅以对两个成功指标(就业和收入)的最大似然估计。在每个模型中,我们明确地测试了术语之间的相互作用,从而推进了文献。研究发现:面板数据分析表明,融资策略对创业公司的成功至关重要,尤其是在与创始人的特定人力和社会资本属性相结合时。例如,天使投资者和风险资本投资者受益于具有行业经验的创始人;受教育程度较高的创始人比同龄人创造更多的收入,特别是当他们的创业公司与大学合作时。对理论和实践的启示:本文提出了企业家应该考虑与其创始人属性互补的融资选择的具体方式。此外,它还表明,文献必须非常深思熟虑,不仅要考虑成功的指标,还要考虑给政策制定者、金融家和企业家的建议,因为我们展示了微妙的非线性和相互作用。原创性和价值:我们通过大型数据集,对输入之间的互补性进行仔细建模,纠正先前研究中潜在的样本选择偏差,以及一套建模结果(生存,就业和收入)来贡献关于创业融资的文献,这些结果允许细微的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival of the funded: Econometric analysis of startup longevity and success
PURPOSE: The existing literature on the success of startup enterprises is thorough in investigating individual factors, but relatively weak in testing those factors in combination. This research tests for interactive effects, i.e., complementarities, between those factors. METHODOLOGY: We use a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate longevity in startups, supplementing it with maximum likelihood estimation of two metrics of success (employment and revenue). In each model, we explicitly test for interactions between terms, thus advancing the literature. FINDINGS: Panel data analysis shows that financing strategy matters to startup success, especially when combined with specific human and social capital attributes of the founders. For example, angel investors and venture capital investors benefit differently from founders with industry experience; founders with higher educational achievement generate more revenue than their peers specifically when their startups collaborate in university partnerships. IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND PRACTICE: The paper suggests specific ways in which entrepreneurs should think about financing options that are complementary with their founder attributes. Further, it suggests that the literature must be very thoughtful, not only about the indicators of success but about advice to policymakers, financiers and entrepreneurs because of the nuanced nonlinearities and interactions we demonstrate. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: We contribute to the literature on startup financing with a large dataset, careful modelling of interactive complementarities of between inputs, correction of the potential sample selection bias in previous studies, and a suite of modelled outcomes (survival, employment, and revenue) which allow for nuanced results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信