F. Carpes, E. Rocha, M. Kunzler, Mathias S. Machado, Camilla F. Andrade, Ana Carolina L. Morais, Bruna C. Mendes, Marieli M. Paz, Maria Eduarda F. Pereira, Vitoria Ferreira, P. Mello-Carpes
{"title":"生物力学奥运会:在过去的9年里,它是提高了学习成绩还是只是提高了最后的成绩?","authors":"F. Carpes, E. Rocha, M. Kunzler, Mathias S. Machado, Camilla F. Andrade, Ana Carolina L. Morais, Bruna C. Mendes, Marieli M. Paz, Maria Eduarda F. Pereira, Vitoria Ferreira, P. Mello-Carpes","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v16i1.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The Biomechanics Olympic Games (BOG) is a teaching method (see Carpes et al., Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(3):436-440) to facilitate biomechanics education. It has been conducted over the past 9 years and replicated in other universities, successfully reducing failing grades.\nAIM: Therefore, a recurrent question is whether the BOG reduces failing grades by raising the physical education and physiotherapy students' final scores or favors improving education.\nMETHOD: To address this question, we considered retrospective data from two biomechanics courses for 9 years and analyzed their final grades considering or not including BOG scores in calculating final grades.\nRESULTS: The score attributed to BOG did not determine the success rate because most class grades were enough to approve, regardless of BOG scores. In this sense, the BOG played the role of facilitator in the teaching-learning processes in biomechanics. We found that enrollment with BOG activities increased the average scores in the classroom by ~7% and reduced variability by ~3% compared to final grades without considering the BOG participation.\nCONCLUSION: The BOG promotes biomechanics education, not by determining the classroom success rate but by promoting a more homogeneous learning development of the classroom.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanics Olympic Games: did it improve learning or just the final grades in the past 9 years?\",\"authors\":\"F. Carpes, E. Rocha, M. Kunzler, Mathias S. Machado, Camilla F. Andrade, Ana Carolina L. Morais, Bruna C. Mendes, Marieli M. Paz, Maria Eduarda F. Pereira, Vitoria Ferreira, P. Mello-Carpes\",\"doi\":\"10.20338/bjmb.v16i1.264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The Biomechanics Olympic Games (BOG) is a teaching method (see Carpes et al., Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(3):436-440) to facilitate biomechanics education. It has been conducted over the past 9 years and replicated in other universities, successfully reducing failing grades.\\nAIM: Therefore, a recurrent question is whether the BOG reduces failing grades by raising the physical education and physiotherapy students' final scores or favors improving education.\\nMETHOD: To address this question, we considered retrospective data from two biomechanics courses for 9 years and analyzed their final grades considering or not including BOG scores in calculating final grades.\\nRESULTS: The score attributed to BOG did not determine the success rate because most class grades were enough to approve, regardless of BOG scores. In this sense, the BOG played the role of facilitator in the teaching-learning processes in biomechanics. We found that enrollment with BOG activities increased the average scores in the classroom by ~7% and reduced variability by ~3% compared to final grades without considering the BOG participation.\\nCONCLUSION: The BOG promotes biomechanics education, not by determining the classroom success rate but by promoting a more homogeneous learning development of the classroom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v16i1.264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v16i1.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生物力学奥林匹克运动会(BOG)是一种促进生物力学教育的教学方法(见Carpes et al., Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(3):436-440)。在过去的9年里,该项目一直在进行,并在其他大学推广,成功地减少了不及格分数。目的:因此,一个反复出现的问题是,BOG是通过提高体育和物理治疗学生的最终成绩来减少不及格成绩,还是有利于改善教育。方法:为了解决这个问题,我们回顾了两门生物力学课程9年的回顾性数据,并分析了他们在计算最终成绩时考虑或不考虑BOG分数的最终成绩。结果:归因于BOG的分数并不能决定成功率,因为大多数班级的成绩足以批准,无论BOG分数如何。从这个意义上说,BOG在生物力学的教与学过程中扮演了促进者的角色。我们发现,在不考虑BOG参与的情况下,与最终成绩相比,参加BOG活动的学生在课堂上的平均成绩提高了约7%,变异率降低了约3%。结论:BOG促进生物力学教育,不是通过确定课堂成功率,而是通过促进课堂学习的同质性发展。
Biomechanics Olympic Games: did it improve learning or just the final grades in the past 9 years?
BACKGROUND: The Biomechanics Olympic Games (BOG) is a teaching method (see Carpes et al., Adv Physiol Educ. 2017;41(3):436-440) to facilitate biomechanics education. It has been conducted over the past 9 years and replicated in other universities, successfully reducing failing grades.
AIM: Therefore, a recurrent question is whether the BOG reduces failing grades by raising the physical education and physiotherapy students' final scores or favors improving education.
METHOD: To address this question, we considered retrospective data from two biomechanics courses for 9 years and analyzed their final grades considering or not including BOG scores in calculating final grades.
RESULTS: The score attributed to BOG did not determine the success rate because most class grades were enough to approve, regardless of BOG scores. In this sense, the BOG played the role of facilitator in the teaching-learning processes in biomechanics. We found that enrollment with BOG activities increased the average scores in the classroom by ~7% and reduced variability by ~3% compared to final grades without considering the BOG participation.
CONCLUSION: The BOG promotes biomechanics education, not by determining the classroom success rate but by promoting a more homogeneous learning development of the classroom.