用最优最差法评价越南最后一英里配送服务提供商的选择因素

Q3 Engineering
Enrico D'agostini
{"title":"用最优最差法评价越南最后一英里配送服务提供商的选择因素","authors":"Enrico D'agostini","doi":"10.59160/ijscm.v12i2.6166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent trends in supply chain show that last mile delivery is one of the fastest growing segments in logistics yet, it remains one the most challenging ones in terms of reliability, cost, and consumers’ requirements. This study aims to identify the factors directly affecting the competitiveness of logistics companies providing last-mile delivery service under a consumers’ perspective. The study employs a best-worst method (BWM) to assess which alternative and which criteria are the preferred ones when selecting a last-mile service provider in Vietnam. The selected criteria include shipping cost, lead-time, customer service, insurance policy and delivery liability, and the alternative are three last-mile service providers namely GHN, GHTK, JT, the largest logistics companies operating in Vietnam. The study findings reveal that GHTK company is the most competitive last-mile service provider compared to the others due to outstanding intrinsic characteristics and competitive advantage. In particular, the findings of the paper show that customer value \"Delivery cost\" as the most important criterion in domestic last-mile delivery whilst \"Customer Service\" is the least important one in the Vietnamese market.","PeriodicalId":37872,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Selection Factors for Vietnamese Last-Mile Delivery Service Providers using Best Worst Method\",\"authors\":\"Enrico D'agostini\",\"doi\":\"10.59160/ijscm.v12i2.6166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent trends in supply chain show that last mile delivery is one of the fastest growing segments in logistics yet, it remains one the most challenging ones in terms of reliability, cost, and consumers’ requirements. This study aims to identify the factors directly affecting the competitiveness of logistics companies providing last-mile delivery service under a consumers’ perspective. The study employs a best-worst method (BWM) to assess which alternative and which criteria are the preferred ones when selecting a last-mile service provider in Vietnam. The selected criteria include shipping cost, lead-time, customer service, insurance policy and delivery liability, and the alternative are three last-mile service providers namely GHN, GHTK, JT, the largest logistics companies operating in Vietnam. The study findings reveal that GHTK company is the most competitive last-mile service provider compared to the others due to outstanding intrinsic characteristics and competitive advantage. In particular, the findings of the paper show that customer value \\\"Delivery cost\\\" as the most important criterion in domestic last-mile delivery whilst \\\"Customer Service\\\" is the least important one in the Vietnamese market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v12i2.6166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v12i2.6166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

供应链的最新趋势表明,最后一英里交付是物流中增长最快的部分之一,但在可靠性、成本和消费者需求方面,它仍然是最具挑战性的部分之一。本研究旨在找出消费者视角下物流公司提供最后一公里配送服务的竞争力的直接影响因素。该研究采用最佳-最差方法(BWM)来评估在越南选择最后一英里服务提供商时,哪些替代方案和哪些标准是首选的。选择的标准包括运输成本,交货时间,客户服务,保险政策和交付责任,以及三个最后一英里服务提供商,即GHN, GHTK, JT,在越南经营的最大的物流公司。研究结果表明,GHTK公司因其突出的内在特征和竞争优势而成为最具竞争力的最后一英里服务提供商。特别是,本文的研究结果表明,客户价值“交付成本”作为最重要的标准在国内的最后一英里交付,而“客户服务”是最不重要的一个在越南市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Selection Factors for Vietnamese Last-Mile Delivery Service Providers using Best Worst Method
Recent trends in supply chain show that last mile delivery is one of the fastest growing segments in logistics yet, it remains one the most challenging ones in terms of reliability, cost, and consumers’ requirements. This study aims to identify the factors directly affecting the competitiveness of logistics companies providing last-mile delivery service under a consumers’ perspective. The study employs a best-worst method (BWM) to assess which alternative and which criteria are the preferred ones when selecting a last-mile service provider in Vietnam. The selected criteria include shipping cost, lead-time, customer service, insurance policy and delivery liability, and the alternative are three last-mile service providers namely GHN, GHTK, JT, the largest logistics companies operating in Vietnam. The study findings reveal that GHTK company is the most competitive last-mile service provider compared to the others due to outstanding intrinsic characteristics and competitive advantage. In particular, the findings of the paper show that customer value "Delivery cost" as the most important criterion in domestic last-mile delivery whilst "Customer Service" is the least important one in the Vietnamese market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信