许愿池与许愿池-水培系统生物质产量的比较评价

Md. Rayhan Hossain
{"title":"许愿池与许愿池-水培系统生物质产量的比较评价","authors":"Md. Rayhan Hossain","doi":"10.47440/jafe.2020.1304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was conducted for 120 days from 01 March 2019 to 30 June 2019 at Saver, Doshaid the peri-urban area near Dhaka city. The objective of the study was to assess the growth performances of tilapia and vegetable production in the wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. The initial length and weight of tilapia juvenile (Oreochromis niloticus) of 5.17±0.14 to 5.15±0.12cm and 3.24±0.30 to 3.35±0.13g were stocked at the rate of 200 fish/m3 pond area in wish pond aquaponics and wish pond system, respectively. The Brinjal, chilli and mint were planted in both wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. A commercial floating pellet feed of 30% protein was fed the fish at the rate of 5% body weight twice daily. Both the wish pond-aquaponics and wish pond waster was aerated with air pump and stones. The wish pond-aquaponics water was filtered through the vegetable media but wish pond water was not such filtration system rather partial water change was done in each month. The survival rate and total production of fish were higher (89.17±3.82%, 34.88±2.22 tons/ha/120 days) in wish pond-aquaponics system than the wish pond system (76.67±2.08, 26.33±0.87 tons/ha/120 days). Moreover, the vegetables production was also found higher in wish pond-aquaponics system (Brinjal 40.97±5.25, Chilli 9.54±0.84 and Mint 12.81±1.22) than the wish pond system (Brinjal 30.58±2.06, Chilli 7.92±0.16 and Mint 10.08±0.29). Water quality and nutrient utilization was comparatively better in wish pond-aquaponics system as the water was filtered by brick lets and plant roots and nutrients utilized by the plants which was absent in wish pond system. Therefore, the wish pond-aquaponics system performed better than the wish pond system and proved the system is environmental friendly and sustainable.","PeriodicalId":14096,"journal":{"name":"International journal of food, agriculture and environment","volume":"271 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative assessment of biomass production in wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics system\",\"authors\":\"Md. Rayhan Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.47440/jafe.2020.1304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research was conducted for 120 days from 01 March 2019 to 30 June 2019 at Saver, Doshaid the peri-urban area near Dhaka city. The objective of the study was to assess the growth performances of tilapia and vegetable production in the wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. The initial length and weight of tilapia juvenile (Oreochromis niloticus) of 5.17±0.14 to 5.15±0.12cm and 3.24±0.30 to 3.35±0.13g were stocked at the rate of 200 fish/m3 pond area in wish pond aquaponics and wish pond system, respectively. The Brinjal, chilli and mint were planted in both wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. A commercial floating pellet feed of 30% protein was fed the fish at the rate of 5% body weight twice daily. Both the wish pond-aquaponics and wish pond waster was aerated with air pump and stones. The wish pond-aquaponics water was filtered through the vegetable media but wish pond water was not such filtration system rather partial water change was done in each month. The survival rate and total production of fish were higher (89.17±3.82%, 34.88±2.22 tons/ha/120 days) in wish pond-aquaponics system than the wish pond system (76.67±2.08, 26.33±0.87 tons/ha/120 days). Moreover, the vegetables production was also found higher in wish pond-aquaponics system (Brinjal 40.97±5.25, Chilli 9.54±0.84 and Mint 12.81±1.22) than the wish pond system (Brinjal 30.58±2.06, Chilli 7.92±0.16 and Mint 10.08±0.29). Water quality and nutrient utilization was comparatively better in wish pond-aquaponics system as the water was filtered by brick lets and plant roots and nutrients utilized by the plants which was absent in wish pond system. Therefore, the wish pond-aquaponics system performed better than the wish pond system and proved the system is environmental friendly and sustainable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of food, agriculture and environment\",\"volume\":\"271 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of food, agriculture and environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47440/jafe.2020.1304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of food, agriculture and environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47440/jafe.2020.1304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究于2019年3月1日至2019年6月30日在达卡市附近的城郊地区Saver, Doshaid进行了120天的研究。本研究的目的是评估罗非鱼的生长性能和蔬菜生产在祝愿池和祝愿池-水培系统。以200尾/m3池面积放养罗非鱼幼鱼(Oreochromis niloticus),初始长度为5.17±0.14 ~ 5.15±0.12cm,初始体重为3.24±0.30 ~ 3.35±0.13g。茄子、辣椒和薄荷都种植在许愿池和许愿池-水培系统中。每日2次,按5%体重投喂蛋白质含量为30%的商业浮动颗粒饲料。许愿池水培和许愿池污水均采用气泵加石曝气。希望池-水培水是通过蔬菜介质过滤的,但希望池水不是这样的过滤系统,而是每月进行部分换水。鱼体成活率(89.17±3.82%)和总产量(34.88±2.22 t /ha/120 d)高于鱼体成活率(76.67±2.08,26.33±0.87 t /ha/120 d)。此外,祈愿塘-水培系统的蔬菜产量(茄子40.97±5.25,辣椒9.54±0.84,薄荷12.81±1.22)也高于祈愿塘系统(茄子30.58±2.06,辣椒7.92±0.16,薄荷10.08±0.29)。许愿池-水培系统的水质和养分利用率相对较好,因为水是由砖瓦和植物根系过滤的,植物利用的养分是许愿池系统所没有的。因此,愿望池-水培系统的性能优于愿望池系统,证明了该系统的环保性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative assessment of biomass production in wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics system
The research was conducted for 120 days from 01 March 2019 to 30 June 2019 at Saver, Doshaid the peri-urban area near Dhaka city. The objective of the study was to assess the growth performances of tilapia and vegetable production in the wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. The initial length and weight of tilapia juvenile (Oreochromis niloticus) of 5.17±0.14 to 5.15±0.12cm and 3.24±0.30 to 3.35±0.13g were stocked at the rate of 200 fish/m3 pond area in wish pond aquaponics and wish pond system, respectively. The Brinjal, chilli and mint were planted in both wish pond and wish pond-aquaponics systems. A commercial floating pellet feed of 30% protein was fed the fish at the rate of 5% body weight twice daily. Both the wish pond-aquaponics and wish pond waster was aerated with air pump and stones. The wish pond-aquaponics water was filtered through the vegetable media but wish pond water was not such filtration system rather partial water change was done in each month. The survival rate and total production of fish were higher (89.17±3.82%, 34.88±2.22 tons/ha/120 days) in wish pond-aquaponics system than the wish pond system (76.67±2.08, 26.33±0.87 tons/ha/120 days). Moreover, the vegetables production was also found higher in wish pond-aquaponics system (Brinjal 40.97±5.25, Chilli 9.54±0.84 and Mint 12.81±1.22) than the wish pond system (Brinjal 30.58±2.06, Chilli 7.92±0.16 and Mint 10.08±0.29). Water quality and nutrient utilization was comparatively better in wish pond-aquaponics system as the water was filtered by brick lets and plant roots and nutrients utilized by the plants which was absent in wish pond system. Therefore, the wish pond-aquaponics system performed better than the wish pond system and proved the system is environmental friendly and sustainable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信