户外学习的价值:来自英国和其他地方研究的证据

J. Dillon, M. Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, M. Morris, Mee-Young Choi, D. Sanders, P. Benefield
{"title":"户外学习的价值:来自英国和其他地方研究的证据","authors":"J. Dillon, M. Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, M. Morris, Mee-Young Choi, D. Sanders, P. Benefield","doi":"10.4324/9781315730486-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article summarises the key findings of a review of the research into outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003. It summarises what is known about the impacts of fieldwork and then discusses what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. This article summarises the key findings of a review that critically examined 150 pieces of research on outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003 (Rickinson et al. , 2004). The Field Studies Council and partner organisations commissioned the review in response to the growing concern that opportunities for outdoor learning by school students in England have decreased substantially in recent years (Harris, 1999; Barker, Slingsby and Tilling, 2002). We found substantial evidence to indicate that fieldwork, properly conceived, adequately planned, well taught and effectively followed up, offers learners opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills in ways that add value to their everyday experiences in the classroom. In this article we distil some of the review’s findings of particular relevance to secondary school teachers. We look first at the impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits, and then discuss what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. The impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"60 1","pages":"107-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"465","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere\",\"authors\":\"J. Dillon, M. Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, M. Morris, Mee-Young Choi, D. Sanders, P. Benefield\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315730486-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article summarises the key findings of a review of the research into outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003. It summarises what is known about the impacts of fieldwork and then discusses what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. This article summarises the key findings of a review that critically examined 150 pieces of research on outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003 (Rickinson et al. , 2004). The Field Studies Council and partner organisations commissioned the review in response to the growing concern that opportunities for outdoor learning by school students in England have decreased substantially in recent years (Harris, 1999; Barker, Slingsby and Tilling, 2002). We found substantial evidence to indicate that fieldwork, properly conceived, adequately planned, well taught and effectively followed up, offers learners opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills in ways that add value to their everyday experiences in the classroom. In this article we distil some of the review’s findings of particular relevance to secondary school teachers. We look first at the impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits, and then discuss what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. The impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"107-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"465\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730486-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730486-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 465

摘要

本文总结了1993年至2003年间发表的户外学习研究综述的主要发现。它总结了关于实地考察的影响的已知情况,然后讨论了有效实践的已知情况,最后讨论了实地考察的障碍。本文总结了一项综述的主要发现,该综述对1993年至2003年间发表的150份户外学习研究进行了严格审查(Rickinson et al., 2004)。田野研究委员会和合作伙伴组织委托进行审查,以回应近年来英国学校学生户外学习机会大幅减少的日益增长的担忧(哈里斯,1999;Barker, Slingsby和Tilling, 2002)。我们发现大量的证据表明,实地考察,适当的构思,充分的计划,良好的教学和有效的跟进,为学习者提供了发展他们的知识和技能的机会,以增加他们在课堂上的日常经历的价值。在这篇文章中,我们提炼了一些与中学教师特别相关的审查结果。我们首先看看实地考察和户外教育访问的影响,然后讨论有效实践的已知内容,最后看看实地考察的障碍。实地考察和户外教育访问的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere
This article summarises the key findings of a review of the research into outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003. It summarises what is known about the impacts of fieldwork and then discusses what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. This article summarises the key findings of a review that critically examined 150 pieces of research on outdoor learning published between 1993 and 2003 (Rickinson et al. , 2004). The Field Studies Council and partner organisations commissioned the review in response to the growing concern that opportunities for outdoor learning by school students in England have decreased substantially in recent years (Harris, 1999; Barker, Slingsby and Tilling, 2002). We found substantial evidence to indicate that fieldwork, properly conceived, adequately planned, well taught and effectively followed up, offers learners opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills in ways that add value to their everyday experiences in the classroom. In this article we distil some of the review’s findings of particular relevance to secondary school teachers. We look first at the impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits, and then discuss what is known about effective practice before concluding with a look at barriers to fieldwork. The impacts of fieldwork and outdoor educational visits
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信