再生砂中硫含量测定方法的比较

METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.37904/metal.2020.3453

J. Vontorová, J. Beňo, Martin Krysmánek, K. Slamová

{"title":"再生砂中硫含量测定方法的比较","authors":"J. Vontorová, J. Beňo, Martin Krysmánek, K. Slamová","doi":"10.37904/metal.2020.3453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the determination of sulphur contents in different types of foundry furan no-bake reclaims from different suppliers using two different methods – combustion elemental analysis and gravimetrically. The first of these methods is the standard fast instrumental method. The work aimed to prove if it could be replaced by the method of traditional analysis, which does not have high demands on instruments.","PeriodicalId":18449,"journal":{"name":"METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF SULPHUR IN RECLAIMED sand\",\"authors\":\"J. Vontorová, J. Beňo, Martin Krysmánek, K. Slamová\",\"doi\":\"10.37904/metal.2020.3453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the determination of sulphur contents in different types of foundry furan no-bake reclaims from different suppliers using two different methods – combustion elemental analysis and gravimetrically. The first of these methods is the standard fast instrumental method. The work aimed to prove if it could be replaced by the method of traditional analysis, which does not have high demands on instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37904/metal.2020.3453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37904/metal.2020.3453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用燃烧元素分析和重量法测定了不同供应商不同类型铸造用免烘再生呋喃中硫含量。第一种方法是标准的快速仪器法。这项工作旨在证明它是否可以被对仪器要求不高的传统分析方法所取代。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF SULPHUR IN RECLAIMED sand

The article deals with the determination of sulphur contents in different types of foundry furan no-bake reclaims from different suppliers using two different methods – combustion elemental analysis and gravimetrically. The first of these methods is the standard fast instrumental method. The work aimed to prove if it could be replaced by the method of traditional analysis, which does not have high demands on instruments.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

METAL 2020 Conference Proeedings

自引率

0.00%

发文量