无形资产作为会计专业知识的对象

S. Zvyagin, Yu. I. Treshchevskiĭ, I. E. Strygina
{"title":"无形资产作为会计专业知识的对象","authors":"S. Zvyagin, Yu. I. Treshchevskiĭ, I. E. Strygina","doi":"10.24891/ia.26.8.904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject. This article examines the theoretical and methodological problems of conducting accounting expertise of illegal actions in relation to intangible assets.\nObjectives. The article aims to analyze the framework of categories and concepts associated with intellectual property, investigate current methods and practices of committing illegal actions with intangible assets, and determine the sequence of expert accounting work and methods of expert research.\nMethods. For the study, we used the systems and logical approaches, and the general scientific cognition methods.\nResults. Based on the results of the categorical analysis, the article presents proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) in them, which most fully reflects the actual state of affairs in this area, as well as proposals on the most important areas of concern of expert accounting research of accounting and intangible asset flow.\nConclusions and Relevance. The presented proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) will most fully reflect the actual state of affairs in this area and reduce risks during control, audit and expert activities. The results of the study can be used in the activities of forensic units of law enforcement agencies, control and audit offices and audit organizations in the examination, control and audit of illegal actions related to intellectual property objects.","PeriodicalId":100047,"journal":{"name":"Advances in International Accounting","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intangible assets as an object of accounting expertise\",\"authors\":\"S. Zvyagin, Yu. I. Treshchevskiĭ, I. E. Strygina\",\"doi\":\"10.24891/ia.26.8.904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subject. This article examines the theoretical and methodological problems of conducting accounting expertise of illegal actions in relation to intangible assets.\\nObjectives. The article aims to analyze the framework of categories and concepts associated with intellectual property, investigate current methods and practices of committing illegal actions with intangible assets, and determine the sequence of expert accounting work and methods of expert research.\\nMethods. For the study, we used the systems and logical approaches, and the general scientific cognition methods.\\nResults. Based on the results of the categorical analysis, the article presents proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) in them, which most fully reflects the actual state of affairs in this area, as well as proposals on the most important areas of concern of expert accounting research of accounting and intangible asset flow.\\nConclusions and Relevance. The presented proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) will most fully reflect the actual state of affairs in this area and reduce risks during control, audit and expert activities. The results of the study can be used in the activities of forensic units of law enforcement agencies, control and audit offices and audit organizations in the examination, control and audit of illegal actions related to intellectual property objects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in International Accounting\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in International Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.26.8.904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in International Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.26.8.904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主题。本文探讨了对与无形资产有关的非法行为进行会计鉴定的理论和方法问题。本文旨在分析与知识产权相关的类别和概念框架,调查目前利用无形资产进行违法行为的方法和做法,确定专家会计工作的顺序和专家研究的方法。在研究中,我们采用了系统的和逻辑的方法,以及一般的科学认知方法。根据分类分析的结果,本文提出了消除监管文件中矛盾的建议,并在其中形成单一的知识产权(无形资产)定义和类型清单,这最充分地反映了这一领域的实际情况,并对会计和无形资产流动专家会计研究最关注的领域提出了建议。结论和相关性。建议消除监管文件中的矛盾,形成单一的知识产权(无形资产)定义和类型清单,这将最充分地反映这一领域的实际情况,并降低控制、审计和专家活动中的风险。研究结果可用于执法机构的法医单位、控制和审计办公室以及审计组织在审查、控制和审计与知识产权对象有关的非法行为方面的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intangible assets as an object of accounting expertise
Subject. This article examines the theoretical and methodological problems of conducting accounting expertise of illegal actions in relation to intangible assets. Objectives. The article aims to analyze the framework of categories and concepts associated with intellectual property, investigate current methods and practices of committing illegal actions with intangible assets, and determine the sequence of expert accounting work and methods of expert research. Methods. For the study, we used the systems and logical approaches, and the general scientific cognition methods. Results. Based on the results of the categorical analysis, the article presents proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) in them, which most fully reflects the actual state of affairs in this area, as well as proposals on the most important areas of concern of expert accounting research of accounting and intangible asset flow. Conclusions and Relevance. The presented proposals for the elimination of contradictions in regulatory documents and the formation of a single definition and list of types of intellectual property (intangible assets) will most fully reflect the actual state of affairs in this area and reduce risks during control, audit and expert activities. The results of the study can be used in the activities of forensic units of law enforcement agencies, control and audit offices and audit organizations in the examination, control and audit of illegal actions related to intellectual property objects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信