牛仔和牛肉的帝国生态

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Aaron Hiltner
{"title":"牛仔和牛肉的帝国生态","authors":"Aaron Hiltner","doi":"10.1017/mah.2022.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beef creates an emotional resonance that far outstrips its place within the market. In the 2000s, chicken may have dethroned beef as the most common meat on American plates, ending its reign since the 1940s, but most people do not seem to associate chicken breasts or poultry farmers with national identity the way Americans see ribeyes and cowboys as symbols of the nation's muscular, frontier past.","PeriodicalId":36673,"journal":{"name":"Modern American History","volume":"52 1","pages":"109 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cowboys and the Imperial Ecology of Beef\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Hiltner\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mah.2022.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beef creates an emotional resonance that far outstrips its place within the market. In the 2000s, chicken may have dethroned beef as the most common meat on American plates, ending its reign since the 1940s, but most people do not seem to associate chicken breasts or poultry farmers with national identity the way Americans see ribeyes and cowboys as symbols of the nation's muscular, frontier past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern American History\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern American History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2022.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2022.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛肉产生的情感共鸣远远超过了它在市场上的地位。21世纪头十年,鸡肉可能已经取代牛肉,成为美国人餐桌上最常见的肉类,结束了它自上世纪40年代以来的统治地位,但大多数人似乎并不把鸡胸肉或家禽养殖户与国家身份联系在一起,就像美国人把肋眼肉和牛仔视为美国肌肉发达的前沿历史的象征那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cowboys and the Imperial Ecology of Beef
Beef creates an emotional resonance that far outstrips its place within the market. In the 2000s, chicken may have dethroned beef as the most common meat on American plates, ending its reign since the 1940s, but most people do not seem to associate chicken breasts or poultry farmers with national identity the way Americans see ribeyes and cowboys as symbols of the nation's muscular, frontier past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern American History
Modern American History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信