印度尼西亚-丁基语(TIKI-T)智力智商性别差异的多维Rasch分析

Whisnu Yudiana, A. Triwahyuni, Hery Susanto
{"title":"印度尼西亚-丁基语(TIKI-T)智力智商性别差异的多维Rasch分析","authors":"Whisnu Yudiana, A. Triwahyuni, Hery Susanto","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empirical evidence on gender differences in the g-factor or general intelligence and various cognitive abilities remains contradictory. Some studies have found that there are no gender differences in general intelligence, while others have found differences between genders in verbal, spatial, and numerical abilities as measured by standardized cognitive tests. This study aims to examine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) on standardized tests that measure verbal, numerical, and spatial/nonverbal abilities, as well as gender differences in item level. The multidimensional Rasch model was used to identify DIF based on four cognitive domains in the Tes Intelegensi Kolektif IndonesiaTinggi (TIKI-T) test. A total of 1,443 undergraduate students were tested. The results of the study showed that while there were several unbiased items, some items were clearly biased against males or females. The DIF was higher in the numerical and verbal subtests for female-male differences, while the DIF on male tests corresponded to spatial/nonverbal subtest performance. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T)\",\"authors\":\"Whisnu Yudiana, A. Triwahyuni, Hery Susanto\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The empirical evidence on gender differences in the g-factor or general intelligence and various cognitive abilities remains contradictory. Some studies have found that there are no gender differences in general intelligence, while others have found differences between genders in verbal, spatial, and numerical abilities as measured by standardized cognitive tests. This study aims to examine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) on standardized tests that measure verbal, numerical, and spatial/nonverbal abilities, as well as gender differences in item level. The multidimensional Rasch model was used to identify DIF based on four cognitive domains in the Tes Intelegensi Kolektif IndonesiaTinggi (TIKI-T) test. A total of 1,443 undergraduate students were tested. The results of the study showed that while there were several unbiased items, some items were clearly biased against males or females. The DIF was higher in the numerical and verbal subtests for female-male differences, while the DIF on male tests corresponded to spatial/nonverbal subtest performance. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于g因子或一般智力和各种认知能力的性别差异的经验证据仍然矛盾。一些研究发现,一般智力没有性别差异,而另一些研究发现,通过标准化认知测试,性别之间在语言、空间和数字能力方面存在差异。本研究旨在检验在标准化测试中差异项目功能(DIF)的存在,这些测试测量语言、数字和空间/非语言能力,以及项目水平的性别差异。本文采用多维Rasch模型在印度尼西亚智力测验(TIKI-T)中识别基于四个认知域的DIF。共有1443名本科生接受了测试。研究结果表明,虽然有几个项目没有偏见,但有些项目显然对男性或女性有偏见。数字和语言测试的DIF较高,而男性测试的DIF与空间/非语言测试的表现相对应。讨论了研究结果的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T)
The empirical evidence on gender differences in the g-factor or general intelligence and various cognitive abilities remains contradictory. Some studies have found that there are no gender differences in general intelligence, while others have found differences between genders in verbal, spatial, and numerical abilities as measured by standardized cognitive tests. This study aims to examine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) on standardized tests that measure verbal, numerical, and spatial/nonverbal abilities, as well as gender differences in item level. The multidimensional Rasch model was used to identify DIF based on four cognitive domains in the Tes Intelegensi Kolektif IndonesiaTinggi (TIKI-T) test. A total of 1,443 undergraduate students were tested. The results of the study showed that while there were several unbiased items, some items were clearly biased against males or females. The DIF was higher in the numerical and verbal subtests for female-male differences, while the DIF on male tests corresponded to spatial/nonverbal subtest performance. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信