关于法律概念:让与、革新、代位与让与

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Dimitar P. Gelev
{"title":"关于法律概念:让与、革新、代位与让与","authors":"Dimitar P. Gelev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2633104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the legal notions of cession, novation, subrogation and assignation in comparative perspective and especially with regard to their understanding and treatment in the roman law. At the outset the paper presents some general legal problems connected with the legal definition of the abovementioned legal terms in order to clarify their exact legal meaning.Paper especially deals with the definitions of cessio and novatio in roman legal system according to Gaius and Justinianus and with the notion of the doctrine of res judicata.In conclusion the author proposes further analysis and reconsideration of the domestic regulation of mentioned legal institutes and avoidance of duplication in domestic legal laws and regulations with acceptance of different legal solutions from different legal systems which are not consistent with basic legal structure of the domestic legal system.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About Legal Notions: Cession, Novation, Subrogation and Assignation\",\"authors\":\"Dimitar P. Gelev\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2633104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the legal notions of cession, novation, subrogation and assignation in comparative perspective and especially with regard to their understanding and treatment in the roman law. At the outset the paper presents some general legal problems connected with the legal definition of the abovementioned legal terms in order to clarify their exact legal meaning.Paper especially deals with the definitions of cessio and novatio in roman legal system according to Gaius and Justinianus and with the notion of the doctrine of res judicata.In conclusion the author proposes further analysis and reconsideration of the domestic regulation of mentioned legal institutes and avoidance of duplication in domestic legal laws and regulations with acceptance of different legal solutions from different legal systems which are not consistent with basic legal structure of the domestic legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2633104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2633104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从比较的角度探讨了让与、革新、代位和让与的法律概念,特别是罗马法对这些概念的理解和处理。本文首先提出了与上述法律术语的法律定义有关的一些一般法律问题,以澄清其确切的法律含义。本文重点论述了盖尤斯和查士丁尼亚努斯对罗马法律体系中割让和革新的定义,以及既判原则的概念。最后,笔者建议进一步分析和反思上述法律机构的国内规制,避免国内法律法规的重复,并接受不同法系的不同法律解决方案,这与国内法体系的基本法律结构不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
About Legal Notions: Cession, Novation, Subrogation and Assignation
This paper deals with the legal notions of cession, novation, subrogation and assignation in comparative perspective and especially with regard to their understanding and treatment in the roman law. At the outset the paper presents some general legal problems connected with the legal definition of the abovementioned legal terms in order to clarify their exact legal meaning.Paper especially deals with the definitions of cessio and novatio in roman legal system according to Gaius and Justinianus and with the notion of the doctrine of res judicata.In conclusion the author proposes further analysis and reconsideration of the domestic regulation of mentioned legal institutes and avoidance of duplication in domestic legal laws and regulations with acceptance of different legal solutions from different legal systems which are not consistent with basic legal structure of the domestic legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信