《阿威罗伊评柏拉图的理想国》中的智慧与权力

C. Colmo
{"title":"《阿威罗伊评柏拉图的理想国》中的智慧与权力","authors":"C. Colmo","doi":"10.1353/tmr.2015.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The union of wisdom and power in Plato’s Republic admittedly puts philosophy in the service of politics. Socrates can raise the question of whether such a service would even be just. That is to say, Plato’s understanding of theoretical or philosophical knowledge creates a tension or—perhaps—a disjunction between theory and practice. In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Averroes turns the Aristotelian dictum that nature does nothing in vain into a tool with which to probe the vanity of a theoretical knowledge which is independent of human will and choice. Averroes is in search of a new understanding of theory grounded in the thought that it is human will and choice, not nature which, at their best, do nothing in vain.","PeriodicalId":85753,"journal":{"name":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","volume":"28 5 1","pages":"308 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wisdom and Power in Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic\",\"authors\":\"C. Colmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tmr.2015.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The union of wisdom and power in Plato’s Republic admittedly puts philosophy in the service of politics. Socrates can raise the question of whether such a service would even be just. That is to say, Plato’s understanding of theoretical or philosophical knowledge creates a tension or—perhaps—a disjunction between theory and practice. In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Averroes turns the Aristotelian dictum that nature does nothing in vain into a tool with which to probe the vanity of a theoretical knowledge which is independent of human will and choice. Averroes is in search of a new understanding of theory grounded in the thought that it is human will and choice, not nature which, at their best, do nothing in vain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib\",\"volume\":\"28 5 1\",\"pages\":\"308 - 318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tmr.2015.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tmr.2015.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:柏拉图《理想国》中智慧与权力的结合,无疑是让哲学为政治服务。苏格拉底可以提出这样的服务是否公正的问题。也就是说,柏拉图对理论或哲学知识的理解,在理论与实践之间制造了一种张力,或者可能是一种脱节。在他对柏拉图的《理想国》的评论中,阿威罗伊把亚里士多德的名言“自然不会徒劳”变成了一种工具,用来探索独立于人类意志和选择的理论知识的虚荣性。阿威罗伊正在寻求一种对理论的新理解,这种理论的基础是这样一种思想,即是人类的意志和选择,而不是自然,尽其所能,不会徒劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wisdom and Power in Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic
Abstract:The union of wisdom and power in Plato’s Republic admittedly puts philosophy in the service of politics. Socrates can raise the question of whether such a service would even be just. That is to say, Plato’s understanding of theoretical or philosophical knowledge creates a tension or—perhaps—a disjunction between theory and practice. In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Averroes turns the Aristotelian dictum that nature does nothing in vain into a tool with which to probe the vanity of a theoretical knowledge which is independent of human will and choice. Averroes is in search of a new understanding of theory grounded in the thought that it is human will and choice, not nature which, at their best, do nothing in vain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信