Finchaa糖业庄园甘蔗基因型性能评价(古巴,2012)

A. Shitahun, T. Feyissa, S. Abebech, F. Mabrahtom, T. Essaya, T. Melaku, D. Zinawu, S. Dereje
{"title":"Finchaa糖业庄园甘蔗基因型性能评价(古巴,2012)","authors":"A. Shitahun, T. Feyissa, S. Abebech, F. Mabrahtom, T. Essaya, T. Melaku, D. Zinawu, S. Dereje","doi":"10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate to evaluate the performance of eleven introduced in 2012 Cuban sugarcane genotypes for Plant Cane (PC) and first ratoon (R-I). The experimental design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), laid out in three replicates. Data were collected for millable stalk, plant height, stalk diameter, single stalk weight, cane yield, brix % juice, pol percent, sugar recovery percent and sugar yield. The differences among the Elven Cuban genotypes and two standard checks were highly significant for all analyzed quantitative traits. Generally, in both plant cane and Ratoon I crop cycles C88-556, C88-356, C90530 and C13281gave higher performances in cane and sugar yield (tons/ha) than the checks B 52298 and NCO 334. Therefore C 88-556, C 132-81, C 90-530 and C 88356 were recommended for seed increase to use in further verification on large plots sooner as Ratoon II data will be confirmed.","PeriodicalId":13830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performances Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes (Cuba 2012) at Finchaa Sugar Estate\",\"authors\":\"A. Shitahun, T. Feyissa, S. Abebech, F. Mabrahtom, T. Essaya, T. Melaku, D. Zinawu, S. Dereje\",\"doi\":\"10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate to evaluate the performance of eleven introduced in 2012 Cuban sugarcane genotypes for Plant Cane (PC) and first ratoon (R-I). The experimental design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), laid out in three replicates. Data were collected for millable stalk, plant height, stalk diameter, single stalk weight, cane yield, brix % juice, pol percent, sugar recovery percent and sugar yield. The differences among the Elven Cuban genotypes and two standard checks were highly significant for all analyzed quantitative traits. Generally, in both plant cane and Ratoon I crop cycles C88-556, C88-356, C90530 and C13281gave higher performances in cane and sugar yield (tons/ha) than the checks B 52298 and NCO 334. Therefore C 88-556, C 132-81, C 90-530 and C 88356 were recommended for seed increase to use in further verification on large plots sooner as Ratoon II data will be confirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"251-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.12.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究是在Fincha糖业庄园进行的,目的是评估2012年引进的11个古巴甘蔗基因型植物甘蔗(PC)和第一再生甘蔗(r - 1)的性能。试验设计采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD),设3个重复。收集了可磨茎、株高、茎粗、单茎重、甘蔗产量、糖度%果汁、pol率、糖回收率和糖产量的数据。在所有分析的数量性状上,古巴精灵基因型和两个标准检验之间的差异都非常显著。一般来说,在甘蔗和Ratoon I作物周期中,C88-556、C88-356、C90530和c13281在甘蔗和糖产量(吨/公顷)方面的表现都高于b52298和NCO 334。因此,推荐C 88-556、C 132-81、C 90-530和C 88356进行增种,以便在Ratoon II数据得到确认后尽快在大面积地块上进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performances Evaluation of Sugarcane Genotypes (Cuba 2012) at Finchaa Sugar Estate
The study was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate to evaluate the performance of eleven introduced in 2012 Cuban sugarcane genotypes for Plant Cane (PC) and first ratoon (R-I). The experimental design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), laid out in three replicates. Data were collected for millable stalk, plant height, stalk diameter, single stalk weight, cane yield, brix % juice, pol percent, sugar recovery percent and sugar yield. The differences among the Elven Cuban genotypes and two standard checks were highly significant for all analyzed quantitative traits. Generally, in both plant cane and Ratoon I crop cycles C88-556, C88-356, C90530 and C13281gave higher performances in cane and sugar yield (tons/ha) than the checks B 52298 and NCO 334. Therefore C 88-556, C 132-81, C 90-530 and C 88356 were recommended for seed increase to use in further verification on large plots sooner as Ratoon II data will be confirmed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信