对拼写错误的细致分析如何帮助我们理解英语拼写的发展?

Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1075/wll.00061.rus

Susie Russak

{"title":"对拼写错误的细致分析如何帮助我们理解英语拼写的发展?","authors":"Susie Russak","doi":"10.1075/wll.00061.rus","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Becoming a proficient speller in English is a challenging task requiring integration of knowledge from multiple\n linguistic and cognitive sources. Spelling in English as a foreign language (EFL) is more complex when the distance between the\n different languages of the speller is great. Whereas binary scoring practices are prevalent, they are not as informative as\n analyses of errors based on linguistic characteristics. The present longitudinal study examined the development of spelling in\n EFL among speakers of Semitic L1, Arabic and Hebrew (N = 354). A dictation task on a\n one-word level assessed spelling from 4th–6th grades. Spellings were first scored for accuracy and then analyzed based primarily\n on phonological and orthographic characteristics. Errors were then grouped according to four predominant developmental trends.\n While similarities with L1 spelling development were noted, some of the error types could be attributed to unique characteristics\n of linguistic distance between Semitic languages and English. Both theoretical and practical implications are considered.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can a fine-grained analysis of spelling errors inform our understanding of the development of spelling in\\n EFL?\",\"authors\":\"Susie Russak\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/wll.00061.rus\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Becoming a proficient speller in English is a challenging task requiring integration of knowledge from multiple\\n linguistic and cognitive sources. Spelling in English as a foreign language (EFL) is more complex when the distance between the\\n different languages of the speller is great. Whereas binary scoring practices are prevalent, they are not as informative as\\n analyses of errors based on linguistic characteristics. The present longitudinal study examined the development of spelling in\\n EFL among speakers of Semitic L1, Arabic and Hebrew (N = 354). A dictation task on a\\n one-word level assessed spelling from 4th–6th grades. Spellings were first scored for accuracy and then analyzed based primarily\\n on phonological and orthographic characteristics. Errors were then grouped according to four predominant developmental trends.\\n While similarities with L1 spelling development were noted, some of the error types could be attributed to unique characteristics\\n of linguistic distance between Semitic languages and English. Both theoretical and practical implications are considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00061.rus\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00061.rus","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

成为一名熟练的英语拼写者是一项具有挑战性的任务，需要整合来自多种语言和认知来源的知识。当不同语言之间的拼写距离较大时，作为外语的英语拼写更为复杂。虽然二元评分的做法很普遍，但它们的信息量不如基于语言特征的错误分析。目前的纵向研究考察了闪族L1、阿拉伯语和希伯来语使用者在英语拼写方面的发展(N = 354)。一项单词水平的听写任务评估了4 - 6年级学生的拼写。首先对拼写的准确性进行评分，然后主要根据语音和正字法特征进行分析。然后根据四个主要的发展趋势对错误进行分组。虽然注意到与母语拼写发展的相似性，但一些错误类型可以归因于闪族语言和英语之间语言距离的独特特征。考虑了理论和实践意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

How can a fine-grained analysis of spelling errors inform our understanding of the development of spelling in EFL?

Becoming a proficient speller in English is a challenging task requiring integration of knowledge from multiple linguistic and cognitive sources. Spelling in English as a foreign language (EFL) is more complex when the distance between the different languages of the speller is great. Whereas binary scoring practices are prevalent, they are not as informative as analyses of errors based on linguistic characteristics. The present longitudinal study examined the development of spelling in EFL among speakers of Semitic L1, Arabic and Hebrew (N = 354). A dictation task on a one-word level assessed spelling from 4th–6th grades. Spellings were first scored for accuracy and then analyzed based primarily on phonological and orthographic characteristics. Errors were then grouped according to four predominant developmental trends. While similarities with L1 spelling development were noted, some of the error types could be attributed to unique characteristics of linguistic distance between Semitic languages and English. Both theoretical and practical implications are considered.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助