{"title":"对于骨盆补片并发症的最佳治疗，尚无基于证据的建议","authors":"C. Matthews","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.15997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review, conducted by Patrice Carter and colleagues in the United Kingdom, aims to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding \"best management\" of pelvic mesh complications according to the indication for referral (BJOG 2019 xxxx). However the results of the analysis appear to add little clarity to the ongoing mesh debate as all mesh types and all patient types are included together.","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No evidence‐based recommendations exist for optimal management of pelvic mesh complications\",\"authors\":\"C. Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.15997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review, conducted by Patrice Carter and colleagues in the United Kingdom, aims to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding \\\"best management\\\" of pelvic mesh complications according to the indication for referral (BJOG 2019 xxxx). However the results of the analysis appear to add little clarity to the ongoing mesh debate as all mesh types and all patient types are included together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
No evidence‐based recommendations exist for optimal management of pelvic mesh complications
This systematic review, conducted by Patrice Carter and colleagues in the United Kingdom, aims to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding "best management" of pelvic mesh complications according to the indication for referral (BJOG 2019 xxxx). However the results of the analysis appear to add little clarity to the ongoing mesh debate as all mesh types and all patient types are included together.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
