寻求联系:英国人的骑术和对了解和被(动物)他人了解的态度

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Ethos Pub Date : 2022-12-25 DOI:10.1111/etho.12371
Rosie Jones McVey
{"title":"寻求联系:英国人的骑术和对了解和被(动物)他人了解的态度","authors":"Rosie Jones McVey","doi":"10.1111/etho.12371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What is it like to know and be known by other creatures? And when do people place ethical importance on knowing or being known by other creatures in particular ways? This article brings ethnography of British equestrianism into dialogue with anthropological inquiries into the cultural variability of intersubjective understanding. I will show that riders’ desire for authentic mutual understanding with horses is part of their critical relationship with the concept of representation. At the same time, riders’ efforts to improve their perceptual “feel” in fact reinvigorate their requirement for a representational model of mind and a skepticism about their senses. To do justice to the distinctive experience of other-mindedness that this brings about, I will argue that comparisons between the knowability of minds in different cultural contexts are best forged in terms of varied <i>stances</i> toward intersubjectivity, rather than in terms of varied ethical expressions of underlying universal intersubjective states.</p>","PeriodicalId":51532,"journal":{"name":"Ethos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12371","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking contact: British horsemanship and stances toward knowing and being known by (Animal) others\",\"authors\":\"Rosie Jones McVey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/etho.12371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>What is it like to know and be known by other creatures? And when do people place ethical importance on knowing or being known by other creatures in particular ways? This article brings ethnography of British equestrianism into dialogue with anthropological inquiries into the cultural variability of intersubjective understanding. I will show that riders’ desire for authentic mutual understanding with horses is part of their critical relationship with the concept of representation. At the same time, riders’ efforts to improve their perceptual “feel” in fact reinvigorate their requirement for a representational model of mind and a skepticism about their senses. To do justice to the distinctive experience of other-mindedness that this brings about, I will argue that comparisons between the knowability of minds in different cultural contexts are best forged in terms of varied <i>stances</i> toward intersubjectivity, rather than in terms of varied ethical expressions of underlying universal intersubjective states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12371\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解和被其他生物了解是什么感觉?人们什么时候会把道德的重要性放在以特定的方式了解或被其他生物了解上?本文将英国马术的民族志与人类学对主体间理解的文化变异性的探讨进行了对话。我将展示骑手对与马真正相互理解的渴望是他们与表征概念关键关系的一部分。与此同时,乘客们努力改善他们的感知“感觉”,实际上重新激发了他们对表征思维模型的需求,并对他们的感官持怀疑态度。为了公正地对待由此带来的独特的他人意识体验,我将论证,在不同文化背景下,心灵的可知性之间的比较最好是根据对主体间性的不同立场来进行的,而不是根据潜在的普遍主体间性状态的不同伦理表达来进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeking contact: British horsemanship and stances toward knowing and being known by (Animal) others

What is it like to know and be known by other creatures? And when do people place ethical importance on knowing or being known by other creatures in particular ways? This article brings ethnography of British equestrianism into dialogue with anthropological inquiries into the cultural variability of intersubjective understanding. I will show that riders’ desire for authentic mutual understanding with horses is part of their critical relationship with the concept of representation. At the same time, riders’ efforts to improve their perceptual “feel” in fact reinvigorate their requirement for a representational model of mind and a skepticism about their senses. To do justice to the distinctive experience of other-mindedness that this brings about, I will argue that comparisons between the knowability of minds in different cultural contexts are best forged in terms of varied stances toward intersubjectivity, rather than in terms of varied ethical expressions of underlying universal intersubjective states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethos
Ethos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethos is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly journal devoted to scholarly articles dealing with the interrelationships between the individual and the sociocultural milieu, between the psychological disciplines and the social disciplines. The journal publishes work from a wide spectrum of research perspectives. Recent issues, for example, include papers on religion and ritual, medical practice, child development, family relationships, interactional dynamics, history and subjectivity, feminist approaches, emotion, cognitive modeling and cultural belief systems. Methodologies range from analyses of language and discourse, to ethnographic and historical interpretations, to experimental treatments and cross-cultural comparisons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信