组织变化背景下的敏捷性

Informing Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.28945/4789
Rimvydas Skyrius, M. Krutinis, Svetlana Nemitko, Justina Valentukevice, Norbert Andzej Gulbinovic, Marija Sanosianaite
{"title":"组织变化背景下的敏捷性","authors":"Rimvydas Skyrius, M. Krutinis, Svetlana Nemitko, Justina Valentukevice, Norbert Andzej Gulbinovic, Marija Sanosianaite","doi":"10.28945/4789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose. This paper, although conceived earlier than the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic, addresses the problem of informing agility as part of organizational agility that has become a rather important issue for business survival. Background. While the general issues of business informing, and business intelligence (BI) in particular, have been widely researched, the dynamics of informing, their ability to act in accord with changes in business and preserve the key competencies has not been widely researched. In particular, the research on BI agility is rather scattered, and many issues need to be clarified. Methodology. A series of in-depth interviews with BI professionals to determine relations between organizational agility and BI agility, and to round up a set of key factors of BI agility. Contribution. The paper clarifies a candidate set of key factors of BI agility and gives ground for future research in relations with areas like corporate and BI resilience and culture. Findings. The interview results show the relations between organizational changes, and changes in BI activities. BI has limited potential in recognizing important external changes but can be rather helpful in making decision choices and detecting internal problems. Lack of communication between business and IT people, existence of data silos and shadow BI, and general inadequacy of organizational and BI culture are the key factors impairing BI agility. Recommendations for Practitioners. There are practical issues around BI agility that need solving, like the reason-able coverage of standards or creation of a dedicated unit to care about BI potential. Recommendations for Researchers. The research is still in its starting phase, but additional interesting directions start to emerge, like relations between BI agility, resilience and corporate agility, or the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues. Impact on Society. Agile business, especially in times of global shocks like COVID-19, loses less value and has more chances to survive. Future Research. Most likely this will be focused on the relations between BI agility, resilience, and corporate agility, and the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues.","PeriodicalId":39754,"journal":{"name":"Informing Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing Agility in the Context of Organizational Changes\",\"authors\":\"Rimvydas Skyrius, M. Krutinis, Svetlana Nemitko, Justina Valentukevice, Norbert Andzej Gulbinovic, Marija Sanosianaite\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/4789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim/Purpose. This paper, although conceived earlier than the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic, addresses the problem of informing agility as part of organizational agility that has become a rather important issue for business survival. Background. While the general issues of business informing, and business intelligence (BI) in particular, have been widely researched, the dynamics of informing, their ability to act in accord with changes in business and preserve the key competencies has not been widely researched. In particular, the research on BI agility is rather scattered, and many issues need to be clarified. Methodology. A series of in-depth interviews with BI professionals to determine relations between organizational agility and BI agility, and to round up a set of key factors of BI agility. Contribution. The paper clarifies a candidate set of key factors of BI agility and gives ground for future research in relations with areas like corporate and BI resilience and culture. Findings. The interview results show the relations between organizational changes, and changes in BI activities. BI has limited potential in recognizing important external changes but can be rather helpful in making decision choices and detecting internal problems. Lack of communication between business and IT people, existence of data silos and shadow BI, and general inadequacy of organizational and BI culture are the key factors impairing BI agility. Recommendations for Practitioners. There are practical issues around BI agility that need solving, like the reason-able coverage of standards or creation of a dedicated unit to care about BI potential. Recommendations for Researchers. The research is still in its starting phase, but additional interesting directions start to emerge, like relations between BI agility, resilience and corporate agility, or the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues. Impact on Society. Agile business, especially in times of global shocks like COVID-19, loses less value and has more chances to survive. Future Research. Most likely this will be focused on the relations between BI agility, resilience, and corporate agility, and the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informing Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"19-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/4789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标。虽然本文的构思早于COVID-19大流行的出现,但它解决了通知敏捷性作为组织敏捷性的一部分的问题,这已经成为企业生存的一个相当重要的问题。虽然业务通知,特别是商业智能(BI)的一般问题已经得到了广泛的研究,但通知的动态,它们根据业务变化采取行动的能力以及保持关键竞争力的能力还没有得到广泛的研究。特别是对BI敏捷性的研究比较分散,有很多问题需要澄清。方法。对BI专业人士进行了一系列深入访谈,以确定组织敏捷性和BI敏捷性之间的关系,并收集了一组BI敏捷性的关键因素。本文阐明了商业智能敏捷性的一组候选关键因素,并为未来与企业和商业智能弹性和文化等领域的关系研究奠定了基础。访谈结果显示了组织变革与BI活动变革之间的关系。BI在识别重要的外部变化方面的潜力有限,但在做出决策选择和检测内部问题方面非常有帮助。业务人员和IT人员之间缺乏沟通,数据孤岛和影子BI的存在,以及组织和BI文化的普遍不足是影响BI敏捷性的关键因素。对从业人员的建议。围绕BI敏捷性还有一些实际问题需要解决,比如标准的合理覆盖范围,或者创建一个专门的部门来关注BI潜力。给研究人员的建议。这项研究仍处于起步阶段,但其他有趣的方向开始出现,比如BI敏捷性、弹性和企业敏捷性之间的关系,或者在BI敏捷性问题上,信息文化和BI文化的作用。对社会的影响敏捷业务,特别是在COVID-19等全球冲击时期,损失的价值更少,生存的机会更多。未来的研究。这很可能集中在BI敏捷性、弹性和企业敏捷性之间的关系,以及为BI敏捷性问题提供信息文化和BI文化的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing Agility in the Context of Organizational Changes
Aim/Purpose. This paper, although conceived earlier than the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic, addresses the problem of informing agility as part of organizational agility that has become a rather important issue for business survival. Background. While the general issues of business informing, and business intelligence (BI) in particular, have been widely researched, the dynamics of informing, their ability to act in accord with changes in business and preserve the key competencies has not been widely researched. In particular, the research on BI agility is rather scattered, and many issues need to be clarified. Methodology. A series of in-depth interviews with BI professionals to determine relations between organizational agility and BI agility, and to round up a set of key factors of BI agility. Contribution. The paper clarifies a candidate set of key factors of BI agility and gives ground for future research in relations with areas like corporate and BI resilience and culture. Findings. The interview results show the relations between organizational changes, and changes in BI activities. BI has limited potential in recognizing important external changes but can be rather helpful in making decision choices and detecting internal problems. Lack of communication between business and IT people, existence of data silos and shadow BI, and general inadequacy of organizational and BI culture are the key factors impairing BI agility. Recommendations for Practitioners. There are practical issues around BI agility that need solving, like the reason-able coverage of standards or creation of a dedicated unit to care about BI potential. Recommendations for Researchers. The research is still in its starting phase, but additional interesting directions start to emerge, like relations between BI agility, resilience and corporate agility, or the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues. Impact on Society. Agile business, especially in times of global shocks like COVID-19, loses less value and has more chances to survive. Future Research. Most likely this will be focused on the relations between BI agility, resilience, and corporate agility, and the role of informing culture and BI culture for BI agility issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informing Science
Informing Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The academically peer refereed journal Informing Science endeavors to provide an understanding of the complexities in informing clientele. Fields from information systems, library science, journalism in all its forms to education all contribute to this science. These fields, which developed independently and have been researched in separate disciplines, are evolving to form a new transdiscipline, Informing Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信