胎儿死亡伦理学的实践评价:一例无伤大雅案例

M. Menegaki, P. Pavlidis, D. Tamiolakis
{"title":"胎儿死亡伦理学的实践评价:一例无伤大雅案例","authors":"M. Menegaki, P. Pavlidis, D. Tamiolakis","doi":"10.4321/S0378-48352006000200006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human response to the death of a loved one varies among different societies, religions, cultures, and races through a series of ceremonies and observances. Since postmortem examination may be offensive to some of these groups, the determination of the need for autopsy should be based on ethical as well as legal principles. Ethics is the \"science which treats of human nature and the grounds of moral obligation; the science of human duty\". Although it is the responsibility of society and the duty of a medical examiner/coroner to provide medico-legal death investigation, establishing dogmatic policy is apt to create confrontation rather than fulfillment of statutory obligations. The approach to an objection to autopsy should stress values of \"respect, compassion, kindness and courtesy beyond the minimum required by any policy or guideline\".","PeriodicalId":54462,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Bioetica","volume":"15 1","pages":"39-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical appraisal to ethics in fetal death: a case of anasarca\",\"authors\":\"M. Menegaki, P. Pavlidis, D. Tamiolakis\",\"doi\":\"10.4321/S0378-48352006000200006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human response to the death of a loved one varies among different societies, religions, cultures, and races through a series of ceremonies and observances. Since postmortem examination may be offensive to some of these groups, the determination of the need for autopsy should be based on ethical as well as legal principles. Ethics is the \\\"science which treats of human nature and the grounds of moral obligation; the science of human duty\\\". Although it is the responsibility of society and the duty of a medical examiner/coroner to provide medico-legal death investigation, establishing dogmatic policy is apt to create confrontation rather than fulfillment of statutory obligations. The approach to an objection to autopsy should stress values of \\\"respect, compassion, kindness and courtesy beyond the minimum required by any policy or guideline\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":54462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana De Bioetica\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"39-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana De Bioetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4321/S0378-48352006000200006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4321/S0378-48352006000200006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不同的社会、宗教、文化和种族中,人们对亲人死亡的反应是不同的,通过一系列的仪式和仪式。由于尸体解剖可能会冒犯到其中一些群体,因此确定是否需要尸体解剖应以伦理和法律原则为基础。伦理学是研究人性和道德义务依据的科学;人类义务的科学”。虽然提供法医死亡调查是社会的责任和法医/验尸官的义务,但制定教条式政策容易造成对抗,而不是履行法定义务。反对解剖的方法应该强调“尊重、同情、善良和礼貌,而不是任何政策或指导方针所要求的最低限度”的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical appraisal to ethics in fetal death: a case of anasarca
Human response to the death of a loved one varies among different societies, religions, cultures, and races through a series of ceremonies and observances. Since postmortem examination may be offensive to some of these groups, the determination of the need for autopsy should be based on ethical as well as legal principles. Ethics is the "science which treats of human nature and the grounds of moral obligation; the science of human duty". Although it is the responsibility of society and the duty of a medical examiner/coroner to provide medico-legal death investigation, establishing dogmatic policy is apt to create confrontation rather than fulfillment of statutory obligations. The approach to an objection to autopsy should stress values of "respect, compassion, kindness and courtesy beyond the minimum required by any policy or guideline".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Bioetica
Revista Romana De Bioetica 医学-医学:伦理
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信