高性能计算存储系统的乐观协调问题

P. Carns, K. Harms, D. Kimpe, R. Ross, J. Wozniak, L. Ward, M. Curry, Ruth Klundt, Geoff Danielson, Cengiz Karakoyunlu, J. Chandy, Bradley Settlemeyer, W. Gropp
{"title":"高性能计算存储系统的乐观协调问题","authors":"P. Carns, K. Harms, D. Kimpe, R. Ross, J. Wozniak, L. Ward, M. Curry, Ruth Klundt, Geoff Danielson, Cengiz Karakoyunlu, J. Chandy, Bradley Settlemeyer, W. Gropp","doi":"10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-performance computing (HPC) storage systems rely on access coordination to ensure that concurrent updates do not produce incoherent results. HPC storage systems typically employ pessimistic distributed locking to provide this functionality in cases where applications cannot perform their own coordination. This approach, however, introduces significant performance overhead and complicates fault handling. In this work we evaluate the viability of optimistic conditional storage operations as an alternative to distributed locking in HPC storage systems. We investigate design strategies and compare the two approaches in a prototype object storage system using a parallel read/modify/write benchmark. Our prototype illustrates that conditional operations can be easily integrated into distributed object storage systems and can outperform standard coordination primitives for simple update workloads. Our experiments show that conditional updates can achieve over two orders of magnitude higher performance than pessimistic locking for some parallel read/modify/write workloads.","PeriodicalId":6346,"journal":{"name":"2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis","volume":"34 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case for Optimistic Coordination in HPC Storage Systems\",\"authors\":\"P. Carns, K. Harms, D. Kimpe, R. Ross, J. Wozniak, L. Ward, M. Curry, Ruth Klundt, Geoff Danielson, Cengiz Karakoyunlu, J. Chandy, Bradley Settlemeyer, W. Gropp\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High-performance computing (HPC) storage systems rely on access coordination to ensure that concurrent updates do not produce incoherent results. HPC storage systems typically employ pessimistic distributed locking to provide this functionality in cases where applications cannot perform their own coordination. This approach, however, introduces significant performance overhead and complicates fault handling. In this work we evaluate the viability of optimistic conditional storage operations as an alternative to distributed locking in HPC storage systems. We investigate design strategies and compare the two approaches in a prototype object storage system using a parallel read/modify/write benchmark. Our prototype illustrates that conditional operations can be easily integrated into distributed object storage systems and can outperform standard coordination primitives for simple update workloads. Our experiments show that conditional updates can achieve over two orders of magnitude higher performance than pessimistic locking for some parallel read/modify/write workloads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"48-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

高性能计算(HPC)存储系统依靠访问协调来确保并发更新不会产生不一致的结果。HPC存储系统通常在应用程序无法执行自身协调的情况下使用悲观分布式锁定来提供此功能。然而,这种方法带来了巨大的性能开销,并使故障处理变得复杂。在这项工作中,我们评估了乐观条件存储操作作为高性能计算存储系统中分布式锁定的替代方案的可行性。我们研究了设计策略,并在使用并行读/修改/写基准的原型对象存储系统中比较了两种方法。我们的原型说明了条件操作可以很容易地集成到分布式对象存储系统中,并且可以在简单的更新工作负载中优于标准协调原语。我们的实验表明,对于一些并行读/修改/写工作负载,条件更新可以实现比悲观锁定高出两个数量级的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Case for Optimistic Coordination in HPC Storage Systems
High-performance computing (HPC) storage systems rely on access coordination to ensure that concurrent updates do not produce incoherent results. HPC storage systems typically employ pessimistic distributed locking to provide this functionality in cases where applications cannot perform their own coordination. This approach, however, introduces significant performance overhead and complicates fault handling. In this work we evaluate the viability of optimistic conditional storage operations as an alternative to distributed locking in HPC storage systems. We investigate design strategies and compare the two approaches in a prototype object storage system using a parallel read/modify/write benchmark. Our prototype illustrates that conditional operations can be easily integrated into distributed object storage systems and can outperform standard coordination primitives for simple update workloads. Our experiments show that conditional updates can achieve over two orders of magnitude higher performance than pessimistic locking for some parallel read/modify/write workloads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信