用FIBO延期在REA中索赔债务和股权(短文)

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Robert A. Nehmer, Michael Bennett, Maxwell R. Gillmore
{"title":"用FIBO延期在REA中索赔债务和股权(短文)","authors":"Robert A. Nehmer, Michael Bennett, Maxwell R. Gillmore","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v24i5.5549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an ontological analysis of the concepts proposed for extensions to the REA ontology to accommodate or define Debt and Equity. Earlier work aimed to use the REA concept of ‘Claim’ to provide the language in which to create a symmetrical treatment for Debt and Equity, however no such symmetry was apparent. The exploration given here uses the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to take a step back and consider the range of possible concepts to which the word ‘claim’ may be mapped, comparing these to the canonical REA concept for Claim. We analyzed three such concepts, rejected one, found another to be coextensive to Debt and were left with a third, useful concept that does not precisely map to REA Claim. We established that the concepts needed for Debt and for Equity can be defined using existing REA concepts, by abstracting Commitment to a broader usage in agreements generally. Finally, we identify work that remains to be done to unify the models developed in this exploration, with canonical REA concepts.","PeriodicalId":43552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Claims Debt and Equity in REA with FIBO Extensions (short paper)\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Nehmer, Michael Bennett, Maxwell R. Gillmore\",\"doi\":\"10.33423/jabe.v24i5.5549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an ontological analysis of the concepts proposed for extensions to the REA ontology to accommodate or define Debt and Equity. Earlier work aimed to use the REA concept of ‘Claim’ to provide the language in which to create a symmetrical treatment for Debt and Equity, however no such symmetry was apparent. The exploration given here uses the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to take a step back and consider the range of possible concepts to which the word ‘claim’ may be mapped, comparing these to the canonical REA concept for Claim. We analyzed three such concepts, rejected one, found another to be coextensive to Debt and were left with a third, useful concept that does not precisely map to REA Claim. We established that the concepts needed for Debt and for Equity can be defined using existing REA concepts, by abstracting Commitment to a broader usage in agreements generally. Finally, we identify work that remains to be done to unify the models developed in this exploration, with canonical REA concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v24i5.5549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v24i5.5549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对REA本体的扩展概念进行了本体论分析,以适应或定义债务和权益。早期的工作旨在使用REA的“索赔”概念来提供语言,以创建债务和股权的对称处理,但这种对称并不明显。这里给出的探索使用设计科学研究(DSR)方法退后一步,考虑“权利要求”一词可能映射的可能概念的范围,并将这些概念与权利要求的规范REA概念进行比较。我们分析了三个这样的概念,拒绝了一个,发现另一个与债务同样广泛,并留下了第三个有用的概念,它不能精确地映射到REA Claim。通过将承诺抽象为协议中更广泛的用法,我们确定了债务和权益所需的概念可以使用现有的REA概念来定义。最后,我们确定了需要完成的工作,以便将本探索中开发的模型与规范的REA概念统一起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Claims Debt and Equity in REA with FIBO Extensions (short paper)
This paper presents an ontological analysis of the concepts proposed for extensions to the REA ontology to accommodate or define Debt and Equity. Earlier work aimed to use the REA concept of ‘Claim’ to provide the language in which to create a symmetrical treatment for Debt and Equity, however no such symmetry was apparent. The exploration given here uses the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to take a step back and consider the range of possible concepts to which the word ‘claim’ may be mapped, comparing these to the canonical REA concept for Claim. We analyzed three such concepts, rejected one, found another to be coextensive to Debt and were left with a third, useful concept that does not precisely map to REA Claim. We established that the concepts needed for Debt and for Equity can be defined using existing REA concepts, by abstracting Commitment to a broader usage in agreements generally. Finally, we identify work that remains to be done to unify the models developed in this exploration, with canonical REA concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
30.80%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信