加纳北部不同植被类型下人为火灾对土壤有机碳储量的影响

E. Nyadzi, Benjamin kofi Nyarko, Mathew I. S Ezenwa
{"title":"加纳北部不同植被类型下人为火灾对土壤有机碳储量的影响","authors":"E. Nyadzi, Benjamin kofi Nyarko, Mathew I. S Ezenwa","doi":"10.5539/ESR.V8N1P27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effect of fires on the distribution of SOCS under different vegetation types. Soil samples were randomly collected on 34 plots and 24 sample points at depths 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm and 20–30 cm per plot in Northern Region of Ghana. Experimentally, 50m x 50m plots were marked out on burnt and unburnt lands under four different vegetation types. % C and bulk density were estimated using Walkley Black and core methods respectively. Results show that SOCS insignificantly (P>0.05) varied under the vegetation types with close savanna woodland (CSW) recording the highest of ~16.7t/ha on unburnt sites and ~19.4 t/ha on burnt sites while Grass/herbs with scattered trees and shrubs (GHST) recoded ~7.9 t/ha and ~9.4 t/ha on unburnt and burnt sites, respectively. The difference in % C and bulk density across depth were statistically significant (P<0.05). A strong negative correlation existed between bulk density & %C and bulk density & SOCS. We conclude that contrary to previous studies fire significantly (P<0.05) increased SOCS on fallow lands depending on fire temperature. However, vegetation types in the savannah of Ghana were observed to have an insignificant impact on the quantity of SOCs.","PeriodicalId":11486,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Human Generated Fires on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Different Vegetation Types in Northern Ghana\",\"authors\":\"E. Nyadzi, Benjamin kofi Nyarko, Mathew I. S Ezenwa\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ESR.V8N1P27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the effect of fires on the distribution of SOCS under different vegetation types. Soil samples were randomly collected on 34 plots and 24 sample points at depths 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm and 20–30 cm per plot in Northern Region of Ghana. Experimentally, 50m x 50m plots were marked out on burnt and unburnt lands under four different vegetation types. % C and bulk density were estimated using Walkley Black and core methods respectively. Results show that SOCS insignificantly (P>0.05) varied under the vegetation types with close savanna woodland (CSW) recording the highest of ~16.7t/ha on unburnt sites and ~19.4 t/ha on burnt sites while Grass/herbs with scattered trees and shrubs (GHST) recoded ~7.9 t/ha and ~9.4 t/ha on unburnt and burnt sites, respectively. The difference in % C and bulk density across depth were statistically significant (P<0.05). A strong negative correlation existed between bulk density & %C and bulk density & SOCS. We conclude that contrary to previous studies fire significantly (P<0.05) increased SOCS on fallow lands depending on fire temperature. However, vegetation types in the savannah of Ghana were observed to have an insignificant impact on the quantity of SOCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Science Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ESR.V8N1P27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ESR.V8N1P27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了不同植被类型下火灾对SOCS分布的影响。在加纳北部地区的34个样地和24个样点上随机采集土壤样品,每个样地深度分别为0-10 cm、10-20 cm和20-30 cm。实验中,在四种不同植被类型下,在燃烧和未燃烧的土地上划出50m x 50m的地块。% C和容重分别用Walkley Black法和core法估算。结果表明,不同植被类型的SOCS差异不显著(P>0.05),其中疏密热带草原林地(CSW)在未烧地最高,为~16.7t/ha,在烧地最高,为~19.4 t/ha,而散密乔灌木(GHST)在未烧地最高,为~7.9 t/ha,在烧地最高,为~9.4 t/ha。% C、容重跨深度差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。容重& %C与容重& SOCS之间存在较强的负相关关系。与以往的研究相反,火灾显著(P<0.05)增加了休耕地的SOCS,这取决于火灾温度。然而,加纳大草原的植被类型对soc的数量影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Human Generated Fires on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Different Vegetation Types in Northern Ghana
This study examined the effect of fires on the distribution of SOCS under different vegetation types. Soil samples were randomly collected on 34 plots and 24 sample points at depths 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm and 20–30 cm per plot in Northern Region of Ghana. Experimentally, 50m x 50m plots were marked out on burnt and unburnt lands under four different vegetation types. % C and bulk density were estimated using Walkley Black and core methods respectively. Results show that SOCS insignificantly (P>0.05) varied under the vegetation types with close savanna woodland (CSW) recording the highest of ~16.7t/ha on unburnt sites and ~19.4 t/ha on burnt sites while Grass/herbs with scattered trees and shrubs (GHST) recoded ~7.9 t/ha and ~9.4 t/ha on unburnt and burnt sites, respectively. The difference in % C and bulk density across depth were statistically significant (P<0.05). A strong negative correlation existed between bulk density & %C and bulk density & SOCS. We conclude that contrary to previous studies fire significantly (P<0.05) increased SOCS on fallow lands depending on fire temperature. However, vegetation types in the savannah of Ghana were observed to have an insignificant impact on the quantity of SOCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信