短期碳矿化分析中测定前二氧化碳损失的量化和校正

4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
M. Belanger, C. Vizza, G. Robertson, Sarah S. Roley
{"title":"短期碳矿化分析中测定前二氧化碳损失的量化和校正","authors":"M. Belanger, C. Vizza, G. Robertson, Sarah S. Roley","doi":"10.5194/SOIL-7-47-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The active fraction of soil organic carbon is an important component of soil health and often is\nquickly assessed as the pulse of CO2 released by re-wetting dried soils in short-term\n(24–72 h) assays. However, soils can lose carbon (C) as they dry and, if soil samples vary in moisture content at sampling, differential C loss during the pre-assay dry-down period may\ncomplicate the assay's interpretations. We examined the impact of pre-assay CO2 loss in\na long-cultivated agricultural soil at initial moisture contents of 30 %, 50 %, and 70 %\nwater-filled pore space (WFPS). We found that 50 % and 70 % WFPS treatments lost more C during\ndrying than did those in the 30 % WFPS treatment and that dry-down losses led to a 26 %–32 % underestimate of their CO2 pulses. We developed a soil-specific\ncorrection factor to account for these initial soil moisture effects. Future C mineralization\nstudies may benefit from similar corrections.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying and correcting for pre-assay CO2 loss in short-term carbon mineralization assays\",\"authors\":\"M. Belanger, C. Vizza, G. Robertson, Sarah S. Roley\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/SOIL-7-47-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The active fraction of soil organic carbon is an important component of soil health and often is\\nquickly assessed as the pulse of CO2 released by re-wetting dried soils in short-term\\n(24–72 h) assays. However, soils can lose carbon (C) as they dry and, if soil samples vary in moisture content at sampling, differential C loss during the pre-assay dry-down period may\\ncomplicate the assay's interpretations. We examined the impact of pre-assay CO2 loss in\\na long-cultivated agricultural soil at initial moisture contents of 30 %, 50 %, and 70 %\\nwater-filled pore space (WFPS). We found that 50 % and 70 % WFPS treatments lost more C during\\ndrying than did those in the 30 % WFPS treatment and that dry-down losses led to a 26 %–32 % underestimate of their CO2 pulses. We developed a soil-specific\\ncorrection factor to account for these initial soil moisture effects. Future C mineralization\\nstudies may benefit from similar corrections.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/SOIL-7-47-2021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/SOIL-7-47-2021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要土壤有机碳的活性组分是土壤健康的重要组成部分,通常在短期(24-72小时)测定中通过重新润湿干燥土壤释放的二氧化碳脉冲来快速评估。然而,土壤在干燥时会失去碳(C),如果土壤样品在采样时的水分含量不同,那么在测定前干燥期的不同碳损失可能会使测定的解释复杂化。我们研究了在初始含水率为30%、50%和70%的水填充孔隙空间(WFPS)条件下,长期耕作的农业土壤中测定前CO2损失的影响。我们发现,50%和70%的WFPS处理比30%的WFPS处理在干燥过程中损失更多的碳,并且干燥损失导致其CO2脉冲低估26% - 32%。我们开发了一个土壤特定校正因子来解释这些初始土壤湿度效应。未来的碳矿化研究可能受益于类似的修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying and correcting for pre-assay CO2 loss in short-term carbon mineralization assays
Abstract. The active fraction of soil organic carbon is an important component of soil health and often is quickly assessed as the pulse of CO2 released by re-wetting dried soils in short-term (24–72 h) assays. However, soils can lose carbon (C) as they dry and, if soil samples vary in moisture content at sampling, differential C loss during the pre-assay dry-down period may complicate the assay's interpretations. We examined the impact of pre-assay CO2 loss in a long-cultivated agricultural soil at initial moisture contents of 30 %, 50 %, and 70 % water-filled pore space (WFPS). We found that 50 % and 70 % WFPS treatments lost more C during drying than did those in the 30 % WFPS treatment and that dry-down losses led to a 26 %–32 % underestimate of their CO2 pulses. We developed a soil-specific correction factor to account for these initial soil moisture effects. Future C mineralization studies may benefit from similar corrections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Science
Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science. Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信