评估基于仿真证伪的优化求解器和鲁棒语义

The Archivist Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.29007/f4vs
J. Eddeland, S. Miremadi, K. Åkesson
{"title":"评估基于仿真证伪的优化求解器和鲁棒语义","authors":"J. Eddeland, S. Miremadi, K. Åkesson","doi":"10.29007/f4vs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Temporal-logic based falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems is a testing technique used to verify certain behaviours in simulation models, however the problem statement typically requires some model-specific tuning of parameters to achieve optimal results. In this experience report, we investigate how different optimization solvers and objective functions affect the falsification outcome for a benchmark set of models and specifications. With data from the four different solvers and three different objective functions for the falsification problem, we see that choice of solver and objective function depends both on the model and the specification that are to be falsified. We also note that using a robust semantics of Signal Temporal Logic typically increases falsification performance compared to using Boolean semantics.","PeriodicalId":82938,"journal":{"name":"The Archivist","volume":"105 1","pages":"259-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Optimization Solvers and Robust Semantics for Simulation-Based Falsification\",\"authors\":\"J. Eddeland, S. Miremadi, K. Åkesson\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/f4vs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Temporal-logic based falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems is a testing technique used to verify certain behaviours in simulation models, however the problem statement typically requires some model-specific tuning of parameters to achieve optimal results. In this experience report, we investigate how different optimization solvers and objective functions affect the falsification outcome for a benchmark set of models and specifications. With data from the four different solvers and three different objective functions for the falsification problem, we see that choice of solver and objective function depends both on the model and the specification that are to be falsified. We also note that using a robust semantics of Signal Temporal Logic typically increases falsification performance compared to using Boolean semantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Archivist\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"259-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Archivist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/f4vs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/f4vs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

基于时间逻辑的信息物理系统证伪是一种用于验证仿真模型中某些行为的测试技术,然而问题陈述通常需要一些特定于模型的参数调优以获得最佳结果。在这份经验报告中,我们研究了不同的优化求解器和目标函数如何影响一组基准模型和规范的证伪结果。通过对证伪问题的四个不同解算器和三个不同目标函数的数据,我们可以看到,解算器和目标函数的选择取决于要证伪的模型和规范。我们还注意到,与使用布尔语义相比,使用信号时序逻辑的鲁棒语义通常会提高伪造性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Optimization Solvers and Robust Semantics for Simulation-Based Falsification
Temporal-logic based falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems is a testing technique used to verify certain behaviours in simulation models, however the problem statement typically requires some model-specific tuning of parameters to achieve optimal results. In this experience report, we investigate how different optimization solvers and objective functions affect the falsification outcome for a benchmark set of models and specifications. With data from the four different solvers and three different objective functions for the falsification problem, we see that choice of solver and objective function depends both on the model and the specification that are to be falsified. We also note that using a robust semantics of Signal Temporal Logic typically increases falsification performance compared to using Boolean semantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信