利用本体匹配系统集成COBIT 5 PAM和TIPA的ITIL

Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.4018/ijhcitp.2020070105
Rafael Almeida, Paloma Andrade Gonçalves, Inês Percheiro, M. Silva, César Jesús Pardo Calvache
{"title":"利用本体匹配系统集成COBIT 5 PAM和TIPA的ITIL","authors":"Rafael Almeida, Paloma Andrade Gonçalves, Inês Percheiro, M. Silva, César Jesús Pardo Calvache","doi":"10.4018/ijhcitp.2020070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations can implement enterprise governance of IT (EGIT) over the use of practices such as COBIT 5 and ITIL. Integrating practices provide a more comprehensive and efficient approach, enabling features that would be unavailable through individual practices. Therefore, organizations are now forced to adopt and adapt various EGIT practices. However, the literature lacks a proposal that can assist and guide organizations in assessing different practices in a multi-practices environment. To overcome this issue, this research intends to shed some light in this area by proposing an ontological approach for describing TIPA for ITIL PAM and COBIT PAM, using semantic similarity techniques to compare COBIT and ITIL process assessment core concepts.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating COBIT 5 PAM and TIPA for ITIL Using an Ontology Matching System\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Almeida, Paloma Andrade Gonçalves, Inês Percheiro, M. Silva, César Jesús Pardo Calvache\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijhcitp.2020070105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations can implement enterprise governance of IT (EGIT) over the use of practices such as COBIT 5 and ITIL. Integrating practices provide a more comprehensive and efficient approach, enabling features that would be unavailable through individual practices. Therefore, organizations are now forced to adopt and adapt various EGIT practices. However, the literature lacks a proposal that can assist and guide organizations in assessing different practices in a multi-practices environment. To overcome this issue, this research intends to shed some light in this area by proposing an ontological approach for describing TIPA for ITIL PAM and COBIT PAM, using semantic similarity techniques to compare COBIT and ITIL process assessment core concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.2020070105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.2020070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

组织可以通过使用诸如COBIT 5和ITIL之类的实践来实现IT的企业治理(EGIT)。集成实践提供了一种更全面和有效的方法,启用了通过单个实践无法获得的特性。因此,组织现在被迫采用和适应各种EGIT实践。然而,文献缺乏一个建议,可以帮助和指导组织在多实践环境中评估不同的实践。为了克服这一问题,本研究打算通过提出一种本体论方法来描述ITIL PAM和COBIT PAM的TIPA,使用语义相似技术来比较COBIT和ITIL过程评估的核心概念,从而在这一领域有所揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Integrating COBIT 5 PAM and TIPA for ITIL Using an Ontology Matching System
Organizations can implement enterprise governance of IT (EGIT) over the use of practices such as COBIT 5 and ITIL. Integrating practices provide a more comprehensive and efficient approach, enabling features that would be unavailable through individual practices. Therefore, organizations are now forced to adopt and adapt various EGIT practices. However, the literature lacks a proposal that can assist and guide organizations in assessing different practices in a multi-practices environment. To overcome this issue, this research intends to shed some light in this area by proposing an ontological approach for describing TIPA for ITIL PAM and COBIT PAM, using semantic similarity techniques to compare COBIT and ITIL process assessment core concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信