重新审视国家科学影响的指标

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Allik, K. Lauk, A. Realo
{"title":"重新审视国家科学影响的指标","authors":"J. Allik, K. Lauk, A. Realo","doi":"10.3176/tr.2020.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An improved Indicator of a Nation’s Scientific Impact ( INSI ), which, in addition to citation rates, takes into account how many research areas in which each nation has exceeded the entrance thresholds of the Essential Science Indicators ( ESI ; Clarivate Analytics), was proposed. This indicator provided a more realistic estimate of nations’ scientific impact, which was better predicted from the societal factors that are related to the quality of scientific output. The strongest predictor of countries’ scientific impact was good governance, while economic wealth and research and development expenditure played a relatively minor role in predicting research impact. We conclude that good governance is needed to create an environment, which can facilitate the translation of money invested into the production of high-impact scientific output.","PeriodicalId":44498,"journal":{"name":"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INDICATORS OF THE SCIENTIFIC IMPACT OF NATIONS REVISITED\",\"authors\":\"J. Allik, K. Lauk, A. Realo\",\"doi\":\"10.3176/tr.2020.2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An improved Indicator of a Nation’s Scientific Impact ( INSI ), which, in addition to citation rates, takes into account how many research areas in which each nation has exceeded the entrance thresholds of the Essential Science Indicators ( ESI ; Clarivate Analytics), was proposed. This indicator provided a more realistic estimate of nations’ scientific impact, which was better predicted from the societal factors that are related to the quality of scientific output. The strongest predictor of countries’ scientific impact was good governance, while economic wealth and research and development expenditure played a relatively minor role in predicting research impact. We conclude that good governance is needed to create an environment, which can facilitate the translation of money invested into the production of high-impact scientific output.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2020.2.07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2020.2.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

一个改进的国家科学影响指标(INSI),除了被引率外,还考虑了每个国家超过基本科学指标(ESI)准入门槛的研究领域的数量。Clarivate Analytics)被提出。该指标对国家的科学影响提供了更现实的估计,这可以从与科学产出质量相关的社会因素中更好地预测出来。预测国家科学影响力的最强指标是良好的治理,而经济财富和研发支出在预测研究影响力方面的作用相对较小。我们得出的结论是,需要良好的治理来创造一种环境,这种环境可以促进将投资的资金转化为生产高影响力的科学产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INDICATORS OF THE SCIENTIFIC IMPACT OF NATIONS REVISITED
An improved Indicator of a Nation’s Scientific Impact ( INSI ), which, in addition to citation rates, takes into account how many research areas in which each nation has exceeded the entrance thresholds of the Essential Science Indicators ( ESI ; Clarivate Analytics), was proposed. This indicator provided a more realistic estimate of nations’ scientific impact, which was better predicted from the societal factors that are related to the quality of scientific output. The strongest predictor of countries’ scientific impact was good governance, while economic wealth and research and development expenditure played a relatively minor role in predicting research impact. We conclude that good governance is needed to create an environment, which can facilitate the translation of money invested into the production of high-impact scientific output.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信