通过复杂适应系统方法实现组织弹性:一个概念框架

IF 1.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
H. Akpinar, Didem Özer-Çaylan
{"title":"通过复杂适应系统方法实现组织弹性:一个概念框架","authors":"H. Akpinar, Didem Özer-Çaylan","doi":"10.1108/mrjiam-01-2022-1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe global business environment causes different and difficult kinds of problems that threaten organizational survival. As an important solution, the organizational resilience concept arises and offers holistic philosophy. The resilience concept offers multidisciplinary and valuable eclectic literature to organizational studies that help to produce a wide variety of solutions but causes a lack of consensus to measure and apply resilience at an organizational level. To fill this gap, this paper aims to offer the complex adaptive systems (CAS) approach as a lens to organizations. This paper aims to offer that CAS provides a suitable toolkit to address the organizational resilience concept as it has the potential to offer more generalizable guidance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo reach that goal, this research follows a two-phase systematic literature review. In the first phase, the purpose is to search past five years’ studies (2015–2020) to figure out current trends in organizational resilience concepts. In the second phase, organizational resilience studies, which include the CAS approach, are checked to analyze the alignment procedures of two concepts.\n\n\nFindings\nLiterature shows that the organizational resilience concept has rarely worked from the CAS lens.CAS are more resilient via adaptation and learning as they depend on local interactions that shape and co-evolve together with their dynamic environment, which helps the emergence of self-organization in an unpredictable future. To achieve organizational resilience, the CAS lens proposes a generalizable and applicable framework to organizational studies.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFuture research should also explore the impact of the interrelationship between two concepts; quantitative and qualitative methods should be applied to be able to get empirical results.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCAS lens could be used as a contemporary design idea. The CAS approach enables the learning and adaptation requirement of the organizational resilience concept, which helps to create dynamic capabilities to handle turbulent changes and gain long-lasting competitiveness. Designing organizations’ agents from CAS viewpoint helps to understand and be ready for new trends, such as digitalization or Industry 4.0.\n\n\nSocial implications\nEvaluating organizations from the CAS lens as living systems that co-evolve with their environments reveals different ways to achieve organizational resilience management philosophy. Designing organizations as CAS promotes organizational adaptation and learning, which improves organizational decision-making, increasing organizational resilience in organizations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of the study lies in proposing to achieve organizational resilience via CAS lenses and offering a conceptual framework to achieve organizational resilience.\n","PeriodicalId":45321,"journal":{"name":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving organizational resilience through complex adaptive systems approach: a conceptual framework\",\"authors\":\"H. Akpinar, Didem Özer-Çaylan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mrjiam-01-2022-1265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe global business environment causes different and difficult kinds of problems that threaten organizational survival. As an important solution, the organizational resilience concept arises and offers holistic philosophy. The resilience concept offers multidisciplinary and valuable eclectic literature to organizational studies that help to produce a wide variety of solutions but causes a lack of consensus to measure and apply resilience at an organizational level. To fill this gap, this paper aims to offer the complex adaptive systems (CAS) approach as a lens to organizations. This paper aims to offer that CAS provides a suitable toolkit to address the organizational resilience concept as it has the potential to offer more generalizable guidance.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTo reach that goal, this research follows a two-phase systematic literature review. In the first phase, the purpose is to search past five years’ studies (2015–2020) to figure out current trends in organizational resilience concepts. In the second phase, organizational resilience studies, which include the CAS approach, are checked to analyze the alignment procedures of two concepts.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nLiterature shows that the organizational resilience concept has rarely worked from the CAS lens.CAS are more resilient via adaptation and learning as they depend on local interactions that shape and co-evolve together with their dynamic environment, which helps the emergence of self-organization in an unpredictable future. To achieve organizational resilience, the CAS lens proposes a generalizable and applicable framework to organizational studies.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nFuture research should also explore the impact of the interrelationship between two concepts; quantitative and qualitative methods should be applied to be able to get empirical results.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nCAS lens could be used as a contemporary design idea. The CAS approach enables the learning and adaptation requirement of the organizational resilience concept, which helps to create dynamic capabilities to handle turbulent changes and gain long-lasting competitiveness. Designing organizations’ agents from CAS viewpoint helps to understand and be ready for new trends, such as digitalization or Industry 4.0.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nEvaluating organizations from the CAS lens as living systems that co-evolve with their environments reveals different ways to achieve organizational resilience management philosophy. Designing organizations as CAS promotes organizational adaptation and learning, which improves organizational decision-making, increasing organizational resilience in organizations.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe originality of the study lies in proposing to achieve organizational resilience via CAS lenses and offering a conceptual framework to achieve organizational resilience.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-01-2022-1265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-01-2022-1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

全球商业环境导致各种各样的困难问题,威胁到组织的生存。作为一个重要的解决方案,组织弹性概念应运而生,并提供了整体哲学。弹性概念为组织研究提供了多学科和有价值的折衷文献,有助于产生各种各样的解决方案,但导致在组织层面上缺乏衡量和应用弹性的共识。为了填补这一空白,本文旨在提供复杂适应系统(CAS)方法作为组织的透镜。本文旨在提供CAS提供一个合适的工具包来解决组织弹性概念,因为它有可能提供更一般化的指导。设计/方法/方法为了达到这个目标,本研究遵循了两个阶段的系统文献综述。在第一阶段,目的是搜索过去五年的研究(2015-2020),以找出组织弹性概念的当前趋势。在第二阶段,组织弹性研究,其中包括CAS方法,检查分析两个概念的对齐过程。研究发现:文献表明,组织弹性概念很少从CAS的角度起作用。CAS通过适应和学习更有弹性,因为它们依赖于与动态环境一起形成和共同进化的局部相互作用,这有助于在不可预测的未来中出现自组织。为了实现组织弹性,CAS视角提出了一个可推广和适用于组织研究的框架。未来的研究还应探讨两个概念之间相互关系的影响;定量与定性相结合,才能得到实证结果。scas透镜可作为一种当代设计理念。CAS方法实现了组织弹性概念的学习和适应要求,有助于创造应对动荡变化的动态能力,获得持久的竞争力。从CAS的角度设计组织的代理有助于理解并为新趋势做好准备,例如数字化或工业4.0。从CAS的视角来评价组织作为与环境共同进化的生命系统,揭示了实现组织弹性管理哲学的不同途径。将组织设计为CAS可以促进组织适应和学习,从而改善组织决策,增加组织弹性。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于提出通过CAS视角实现组织弹性,并提供了实现组织弹性的概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achieving organizational resilience through complex adaptive systems approach: a conceptual framework
Purpose The global business environment causes different and difficult kinds of problems that threaten organizational survival. As an important solution, the organizational resilience concept arises and offers holistic philosophy. The resilience concept offers multidisciplinary and valuable eclectic literature to organizational studies that help to produce a wide variety of solutions but causes a lack of consensus to measure and apply resilience at an organizational level. To fill this gap, this paper aims to offer the complex adaptive systems (CAS) approach as a lens to organizations. This paper aims to offer that CAS provides a suitable toolkit to address the organizational resilience concept as it has the potential to offer more generalizable guidance. Design/methodology/approach To reach that goal, this research follows a two-phase systematic literature review. In the first phase, the purpose is to search past five years’ studies (2015–2020) to figure out current trends in organizational resilience concepts. In the second phase, organizational resilience studies, which include the CAS approach, are checked to analyze the alignment procedures of two concepts. Findings Literature shows that the organizational resilience concept has rarely worked from the CAS lens.CAS are more resilient via adaptation and learning as they depend on local interactions that shape and co-evolve together with their dynamic environment, which helps the emergence of self-organization in an unpredictable future. To achieve organizational resilience, the CAS lens proposes a generalizable and applicable framework to organizational studies. Research limitations/implications Future research should also explore the impact of the interrelationship between two concepts; quantitative and qualitative methods should be applied to be able to get empirical results. Practical implications CAS lens could be used as a contemporary design idea. The CAS approach enables the learning and adaptation requirement of the organizational resilience concept, which helps to create dynamic capabilities to handle turbulent changes and gain long-lasting competitiveness. Designing organizations’ agents from CAS viewpoint helps to understand and be ready for new trends, such as digitalization or Industry 4.0. Social implications Evaluating organizations from the CAS lens as living systems that co-evolve with their environments reveals different ways to achieve organizational resilience management philosophy. Designing organizations as CAS promotes organizational adaptation and learning, which improves organizational decision-making, increasing organizational resilience in organizations. Originality/value The originality of the study lies in proposing to achieve organizational resilience via CAS lenses and offering a conceptual framework to achieve organizational resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Management Research welcomes papers, including cross-disciplinary work, on the following areas (but is not limited to): • Human Resource Management • Strategic Management • Organizational Behaviour • Organization Theory • Corporate Governance • Managerial Economics • Cross Cultural Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信