新西兰的绝育和智障人士:需要的权利、责任和明智的咨询

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
C. Hamilton
{"title":"新西兰的绝育和智障人士:需要的权利、责任和明智的咨询","authors":"C. Hamilton","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2014.953185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on the views of non-medical interest groups about sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand. The rationale for undertaking a study in this sensitive area is presented. Notes about survey distribution method are included and participants’ responses outlined. The study found that a majority of participants agreed that intellectually disabled people should make their own decisions about reproductive capacity. Yet a clear tension between an overall endorsement of individual choice and a majority who also considered that sterilization could be warranted in at least some cases emerged from the data. Reasons for sterilization included: the best interests of intellectually disabled people and carers; concerns about sexual health/well-being; lack of sexual control; and concerns about sexual abuse. The extent of agreement with sterilization as a desirable practice for intellectually disabled boys/men was an unexpected finding. The article concludes with questions posed to promote further discussion.","PeriodicalId":39455,"journal":{"name":"Kotuitui","volume":"32 1","pages":"36 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand: rights, responsibility and wise counsel needed\",\"authors\":\"C. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1177083X.2014.953185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports on the views of non-medical interest groups about sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand. The rationale for undertaking a study in this sensitive area is presented. Notes about survey distribution method are included and participants’ responses outlined. The study found that a majority of participants agreed that intellectually disabled people should make their own decisions about reproductive capacity. Yet a clear tension between an overall endorsement of individual choice and a majority who also considered that sterilization could be warranted in at least some cases emerged from the data. Reasons for sterilization included: the best interests of intellectually disabled people and carers; concerns about sexual health/well-being; lack of sexual control; and concerns about sexual abuse. The extent of agreement with sterilization as a desirable practice for intellectually disabled boys/men was an unexpected finding. The article concludes with questions posed to promote further discussion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kotuitui\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kotuitui\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2014.953185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kotuitui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2014.953185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文报道了新西兰非医疗利益集团对绝育和智障人士的看法。提出了在这一敏感领域进行研究的理由。包括调查分配方法的说明和参与者的回答概述。研究发现,大多数参与者都认为智力残疾的人应该自己决定生育能力。然而,从数据中可以看出,总体上支持个人选择和大多数人认为至少在某些情况下可以保证绝育之间存在明显的紧张关系。绝育的原因包括:智力残疾者和照顾者的最佳利益;对性健康/性健康的关切;缺乏性控制;以及对性虐待的担忧。对智力残疾的男孩/男人来说,同意绝育是一种可取做法的程度是一个意想不到的发现。文章最后提出了一些问题以促进进一步的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand: rights, responsibility and wise counsel needed
This article reports on the views of non-medical interest groups about sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand. The rationale for undertaking a study in this sensitive area is presented. Notes about survey distribution method are included and participants’ responses outlined. The study found that a majority of participants agreed that intellectually disabled people should make their own decisions about reproductive capacity. Yet a clear tension between an overall endorsement of individual choice and a majority who also considered that sterilization could be warranted in at least some cases emerged from the data. Reasons for sterilization included: the best interests of intellectually disabled people and carers; concerns about sexual health/well-being; lack of sexual control; and concerns about sexual abuse. The extent of agreement with sterilization as a desirable practice for intellectually disabled boys/men was an unexpected finding. The article concludes with questions posed to promote further discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kotuitui
Kotuitui Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online is an international, open-access research journal published for social scientists in tertiary and research institutions and other organisations worldwide. The Maori name Kotuitui means interweaving and reflects the interdisciplinary nature of the journal. This open access, peer-reviewed journal encourages top-flight social science inquiry and research across all social science disciplines. It also recognises contributions made by the social science research community to other disciplines, including biological and physical sciences, and promotes connections between all research communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信