在联邦国家背景下将气候变化适应纳入主流:奥地利防洪和旅游部门的政策变化?

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
C. Clar, R. Steurer
{"title":"在联邦国家背景下将气候变化适应纳入主流:奥地利防洪和旅游部门的政策变化?","authors":"C. Clar, R. Steurer","doi":"10.15203/OZP.84.VOL43ISS1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While mainstreaming climate change adaptation in unitary states is mainly concerned with integrating respective concerns horizontally across sectors, federal states such as Austria or Germany add a significant vertical dimension to the challenge. Since provinces in these countries have noteworthy competencies, mainstreaming climate change adaptation in a federal state setting also requires that adaptation concerns are coordinated or integrated across na-tional, regional and local levels of government. So far, it is unclear whether powerful provinces make the mainstreaming of climate change adaptation easier or more difficult.  The pre-sent paper addresses this gap by analysing in how far two highly vulnerable yet markedly dif-ferent sectors (i.e. flood protection and tourism) embrace climate change adaptation at and across various levels of government in Austria. On the one hand, the paper shows that both sectors struggle with adaptation issues in their own ways. On the other hand it shows that the Austrian federal political system can (but does not have to) prove helpful for mainstreaming adaptation, mainly because provinces fulfil important coordination and support functions that link federal guidance and local actions. It concludes that the effects of federalism on climate change adaptation cannot be generalised but that they depend on the issue at stake.","PeriodicalId":41922,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Journal of Political Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"23-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in a federal state setting: Policy changes in the flood protection and tourism sectors in Austria?\",\"authors\":\"C. Clar, R. Steurer\",\"doi\":\"10.15203/OZP.84.VOL43ISS1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While mainstreaming climate change adaptation in unitary states is mainly concerned with integrating respective concerns horizontally across sectors, federal states such as Austria or Germany add a significant vertical dimension to the challenge. Since provinces in these countries have noteworthy competencies, mainstreaming climate change adaptation in a federal state setting also requires that adaptation concerns are coordinated or integrated across na-tional, regional and local levels of government. So far, it is unclear whether powerful provinces make the mainstreaming of climate change adaptation easier or more difficult.  The pre-sent paper addresses this gap by analysing in how far two highly vulnerable yet markedly dif-ferent sectors (i.e. flood protection and tourism) embrace climate change adaptation at and across various levels of government in Austria. On the one hand, the paper shows that both sectors struggle with adaptation issues in their own ways. On the other hand it shows that the Austrian federal political system can (but does not have to) prove helpful for mainstreaming adaptation, mainly because provinces fulfil important coordination and support functions that link federal guidance and local actions. It concludes that the effects of federalism on climate change adaptation cannot be generalised but that they depend on the issue at stake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"23-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15203/OZP.84.VOL43ISS1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15203/OZP.84.VOL43ISS1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在单一制国家,气候变化适应的主流化主要是将各自的关注点横向整合到各个部门,而奥地利或德国等联邦制国家则为这一挑战增加了一个重要的垂直维度。由于这些国家的各省具有显著的能力,在联邦州的背景下将气候变化适应纳入主流还需要在国家、地区和地方各级政府之间协调或整合适应问题。到目前为止,还不清楚强大的省份是使适应气候变化的主流化变得更容易还是更困难。本文通过分析两个高度脆弱但又明显不同的部门(即防洪和旅游业)在奥地利各级政府中接受气候变化适应的程度来解决这一差距。一方面,这篇论文表明,这两个部门都在以自己的方式应对适应问题。另一方面,它表明奥地利的联邦政治体系可以(但不必)证明对主流化适应有帮助,主要是因为各省履行了重要的协调和支持职能,将联邦指导和地方行动联系起来。它的结论是,联邦制对气候变化适应的影响不能一概而论,而是取决于利害攸关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in a federal state setting: Policy changes in the flood protection and tourism sectors in Austria?
While mainstreaming climate change adaptation in unitary states is mainly concerned with integrating respective concerns horizontally across sectors, federal states such as Austria or Germany add a significant vertical dimension to the challenge. Since provinces in these countries have noteworthy competencies, mainstreaming climate change adaptation in a federal state setting also requires that adaptation concerns are coordinated or integrated across na-tional, regional and local levels of government. So far, it is unclear whether powerful provinces make the mainstreaming of climate change adaptation easier or more difficult.  The pre-sent paper addresses this gap by analysing in how far two highly vulnerable yet markedly dif-ferent sectors (i.e. flood protection and tourism) embrace climate change adaptation at and across various levels of government in Austria. On the one hand, the paper shows that both sectors struggle with adaptation issues in their own ways. On the other hand it shows that the Austrian federal political system can (but does not have to) prove helpful for mainstreaming adaptation, mainly because provinces fulfil important coordination and support functions that link federal guidance and local actions. It concludes that the effects of federalism on climate change adaptation cannot be generalised but that they depend on the issue at stake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Austrian Journal of Political Science (OZP) is a peer-reviewed journal. Articles from all areas of political science are welcome, including any approach or method. Contributions from other fields and disciplines are also welcome, as long as they show a genuine interest in political issues. While the journal has a focus on issues concerning Austria and Central Europe, it also accepts articles that address, entirely or in part, other topics/other polities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信