{"title":"什么是化学元素","authors":"Ten Hoor, J. Marten","doi":"10.1351/goldbook.c01022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to current IUPAC recommendations, the chemical element X should be \ndefined as the nucleus of the X atom. Consequently, different isotopes with their different nuclei belong to different elements, each one with its own physical and chemical properties. This view leads to the conclusion that we no longer have a periodic table of the elements, but a periodic table of isotopes instead.","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"38 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is a Chemical Element\",\"authors\":\"Ten Hoor, J. Marten\",\"doi\":\"10.1351/goldbook.c01022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contrary to current IUPAC recommendations, the chemical element X should be \\ndefined as the nucleus of the X atom. Consequently, different isotopes with their different nuclei belong to different elements, each one with its own physical and chemical properties. This view leads to the conclusion that we no longer have a periodic table of the elements, but a periodic table of isotopes instead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"37-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.c01022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.c01022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contrary to current IUPAC recommendations, the chemical element X should be
defined as the nucleus of the X atom. Consequently, different isotopes with their different nuclei belong to different elements, each one with its own physical and chemical properties. This view leads to the conclusion that we no longer have a periodic table of the elements, but a periodic table of isotopes instead.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
