基于语料库的拉丁语复数名词的S-V谐和模式研究

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Morallo
{"title":"基于语料库的拉丁语复数名词的S-V谐和模式研究","authors":"A. Morallo","doi":"10.52696/imvd5398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English subject-verb concord can pose problems to learners such as omission of third person singular inflection and overextension due to linguistic typology, phonological and perceptual factors, syntax, and the number of nouns acting as the subject of the sentence, among others. A group of nouns that invites confusion is what Huddleston and Pullum (2002) call nouns with Latin plural endings whose singular forms are uncommon compared to their plural counterparts. This investigation aims to provide teachers with guidance on the general and genre-based agreement patterns of these nouns using the balanced Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). This study found that based on their agreement patterns these nouns can be classified into three groups: 1) nouns whose tendencies are line with prescriptive rules; 2) noun whose tendencies are ambivalent; and 3) nouns which might have already been “reclassified” by speakers. By genres, there was a strong preference to use “plural” verbs with these nouns in the written and the academic components of the corpus while “singular” verbs are preferred in the spoken components. The implications of the study for teaching and research were also provided.","PeriodicalId":52060,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corpus-Based Investigation of S-V Concord Patterns of Nouns with Latin Plural Endings\",\"authors\":\"A. Morallo\",\"doi\":\"10.52696/imvd5398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English subject-verb concord can pose problems to learners such as omission of third person singular inflection and overextension due to linguistic typology, phonological and perceptual factors, syntax, and the number of nouns acting as the subject of the sentence, among others. A group of nouns that invites confusion is what Huddleston and Pullum (2002) call nouns with Latin plural endings whose singular forms are uncommon compared to their plural counterparts. This investigation aims to provide teachers with guidance on the general and genre-based agreement patterns of these nouns using the balanced Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). This study found that based on their agreement patterns these nouns can be classified into three groups: 1) nouns whose tendencies are line with prescriptive rules; 2) noun whose tendencies are ambivalent; and 3) nouns which might have already been “reclassified” by speakers. By genres, there was a strong preference to use “plural” verbs with these nouns in the written and the academic components of the corpus while “singular” verbs are preferred in the spoken components. The implications of the study for teaching and research were also provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52696/imvd5398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52696/imvd5398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语主谓和谐会给学习者带来一些问题,比如由于语言类型、语音和感知因素、句法以及作为句子主语的名词数量等原因,第三人称单数屈折变化的遗漏和过度延伸。Huddleston和Pullum(2002)将一组名词称为具有拉丁复数结尾的名词,这些名词的单数形式与复数形式相比并不常见。本研究旨在利用平衡的当代美国英语语料库(COCA)对这些名词的一般和基于体裁的一致模式提供指导。本研究发现,根据名词的一致性模式,这些名词可以分为三类:1)倾向符合规定性规则的名词;2)具有矛盾倾向的名词;3)可能已经被说话者“重新分类”的名词。从体裁上看,在语料库的书面和学术成分中,这些名词更倾向于使用“复数”动词,而在口语成分中,更倾向于使用“单数”动词。本研究对教学及科研的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corpus-Based Investigation of S-V Concord Patterns of Nouns with Latin Plural Endings
English subject-verb concord can pose problems to learners such as omission of third person singular inflection and overextension due to linguistic typology, phonological and perceptual factors, syntax, and the number of nouns acting as the subject of the sentence, among others. A group of nouns that invites confusion is what Huddleston and Pullum (2002) call nouns with Latin plural endings whose singular forms are uncommon compared to their plural counterparts. This investigation aims to provide teachers with guidance on the general and genre-based agreement patterns of these nouns using the balanced Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). This study found that based on their agreement patterns these nouns can be classified into three groups: 1) nouns whose tendencies are line with prescriptive rules; 2) noun whose tendencies are ambivalent; and 3) nouns which might have already been “reclassified” by speakers. By genres, there was a strong preference to use “plural” verbs with these nouns in the written and the academic components of the corpus while “singular” verbs are preferred in the spoken components. The implications of the study for teaching and research were also provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信