基于鲁棒变异性的改进过程能力指数估计及置信区间

Q3 Mathematics
Mahendra Saha, S. Dey
{"title":"基于鲁棒变异性的改进过程能力指数估计及置信区间","authors":"Mahendra Saha, S. Dey","doi":"10.1515/eqc-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The process capability index (PCI), denoted by 𝐼, is a well-known characteristic in quality control analysis. Using Gini’s mean difference, we construct a new PCI, I G I_{G} say, assuming the two-parameter Weibull distribution (WD). In order to estimate the proposed I G I_{G} when the process follows the WD, we use five classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the obtained estimators with respect to their mean squared errors (MSEs) through a simulation study. Confidence intervals for the proposed PCI are constructed based on five bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) methods. Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of these five BCIs in terms of average widths and coverage probabilities. Finally, three real data sets from electronic and food industries are employed for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed study. All these data sets show that the width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.","PeriodicalId":37499,"journal":{"name":"Stochastics and Quality Control","volume":"1 1","pages":"153 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation and Confidence Intervals of Modified Process Capability Index Using Robust Measure of Variability\",\"authors\":\"Mahendra Saha, S. Dey\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/eqc-2022-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The process capability index (PCI), denoted by 𝐼, is a well-known characteristic in quality control analysis. Using Gini’s mean difference, we construct a new PCI, I G I_{G} say, assuming the two-parameter Weibull distribution (WD). In order to estimate the proposed I G I_{G} when the process follows the WD, we use five classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the obtained estimators with respect to their mean squared errors (MSEs) through a simulation study. Confidence intervals for the proposed PCI are constructed based on five bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) methods. Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of these five BCIs in terms of average widths and coverage probabilities. Finally, three real data sets from electronic and food industries are employed for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed study. All these data sets show that the width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stochastics and Quality Control\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"153 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stochastics and Quality Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2022-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastics and Quality Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过程能力指数(PCI)是质量控制分析中一个众所周知的特征,用𝐼表示。利用基尼均值差,假设双参数威布尔分布(WD),我们构造了一个新的PCI, I G I_{G}。为了在过程遵循WD时估计所提出的I G I_{G},我们使用了五种经典的估计方法,并通过仿真研究比较了所得到的估计器的均方误差(MSEs)的性能。基于五种自举置信区间(bci)方法构建了PCI的置信区间。通过蒙特卡罗模拟研究,比较了这五种bci在平均宽度和覆盖概率方面的性能。最后,采用来自电子和食品行业的三个真实数据集来说明所提出研究的有效性。所有这些数据集表明,在所有其他考虑的bci中,偏差校正加速自举间隔的宽度是最小的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation and Confidence Intervals of Modified Process Capability Index Using Robust Measure of Variability
Abstract The process capability index (PCI), denoted by 𝐼, is a well-known characteristic in quality control analysis. Using Gini’s mean difference, we construct a new PCI, I G I_{G} say, assuming the two-parameter Weibull distribution (WD). In order to estimate the proposed I G I_{G} when the process follows the WD, we use five classical methods of estimation and compare the performance of the obtained estimators with respect to their mean squared errors (MSEs) through a simulation study. Confidence intervals for the proposed PCI are constructed based on five bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs) methods. Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out to compare the performance of these five BCIs in terms of average widths and coverage probabilities. Finally, three real data sets from electronic and food industries are employed for illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed study. All these data sets show that the width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is minimum among all other considered BCIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stochastics and Quality Control
Stochastics and Quality Control Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信