公共问题的社会学

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
J. Paredes, D. Cáceres
{"title":"公共问题的社会学","authors":"J. Paredes, D. Cáceres","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2023000100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following work problematize the constructionist assumptions that underlie the theorization and sociological research of public problems. As such, we review the onto-epistemic components of constructionism and their relationship with the main authors in this research field, with the objective of problematizing them based on pragmatist proposals in the same field. Our proposal is that research on public problems is strengthened by combining both approaches. To prove the point, our argument runs as follows. After the introduction in which we situate the problem, we present the constructionist foundations from the work of Gusfield. Later, we discuss French pragmatist proposals, following D. Cefaï. We finish with a discussion about the relationship with the empirical, analytical, and political scope in the study of public problems.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La sociología de los problemas públicos\",\"authors\":\"J. Paredes, D. Cáceres\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0717-554x2023000100037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following work problematize the constructionist assumptions that underlie the theorization and sociological research of public problems. As such, we review the onto-epistemic components of constructionism and their relationship with the main authors in this research field, with the objective of problematizing them based on pragmatist proposals in the same field. Our proposal is that research on public problems is strengthened by combining both approaches. To prove the point, our argument runs as follows. After the introduction in which we situate the problem, we present the constructionist foundations from the work of Gusfield. Later, we discuss French pragmatist proposals, following D. Cefaï. We finish with a discussion about the relationship with the empirical, analytical, and political scope in the study of public problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2023000100037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2023000100037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面的工作将构成公共问题理论化和社会学研究基础的建构主义假设问题化。因此,我们回顾了建构主义的本体论成分及其与该研究领域主要作者的关系,目的是根据同一领域的实用主义建议对它们提出问题。我们的建议是,结合这两种方法,加强对公共问题的研究。为了证明这一点,我们的论点如下。在介绍了问题的定位之后,我们从Gusfield的工作中提出了建构主义的基础。之后,我们讨论法国实用主义者的建议,下面是D. Cefaï。最后,我们将讨论公共问题研究中与实证、分析和政治范畴的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La sociología de los problemas públicos
The following work problematize the constructionist assumptions that underlie the theorization and sociological research of public problems. As such, we review the onto-epistemic components of constructionism and their relationship with the main authors in this research field, with the objective of problematizing them based on pragmatist proposals in the same field. Our proposal is that research on public problems is strengthened by combining both approaches. To prove the point, our argument runs as follows. After the introduction in which we situate the problem, we present the constructionist foundations from the work of Gusfield. Later, we discuss French pragmatist proposals, following D. Cefaï. We finish with a discussion about the relationship with the empirical, analytical, and political scope in the study of public problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信