先进停车箱及其对骑自行车者与转弯车辆交通冲突率的影响

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
T. K. O. Madsen, Charlotte Tønning, A. V. Olesen, Tove Hels, H. Lahrmann
{"title":"先进停车箱及其对骑自行车者与转弯车辆交通冲突率的影响","authors":"T. K. O. Madsen, Charlotte Tønning, A. V. Olesen, Tove Hels, H. Lahrmann","doi":"10.1080/19439962.2021.1960661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Advanced stop boxes (ASBs) (i.e., marked areas for cyclists in front of the stop line) are mentioned as a potential means to reducing the risk of crashes between cyclists and right-turning vehicles. This study estimates the safety effect of ASBs at signalised intersections using the log-odds method. Seven signalised intersections were filmed for 3,627 hours before and after constructing ASBs. Traffic conflicts were used as a surrogate for crashes. In total, the study found 644 traffic conflicts. The overall safety effect was not statistically significant: the conflict rate for right-hook conflicts decreased by 6% (p = 0.72), and for left-hook conflicts it increased by 21% (p = 0.26). The results differed at the seven sites, and there were only a few statistically significant results. At one site, the conflict rate of cyclists vs. right-turning vehicles decreased significantly, while it significantly increased at another site. One of the seven sites showed a significant increase in the conflict rate of cyclists vs. left-turning vehicles. A likely explanation is that few conflicts occur during the early green phase. In addition, the use rate of the ASB was low (0–2.7%).","PeriodicalId":46672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","volume":"90 1","pages":"1731 - 1749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced stop boxes and their effect on traffic conflict rates between cyclists and turning vehicles\",\"authors\":\"T. K. O. Madsen, Charlotte Tønning, A. V. Olesen, Tove Hels, H. Lahrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439962.2021.1960661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Advanced stop boxes (ASBs) (i.e., marked areas for cyclists in front of the stop line) are mentioned as a potential means to reducing the risk of crashes between cyclists and right-turning vehicles. This study estimates the safety effect of ASBs at signalised intersections using the log-odds method. Seven signalised intersections were filmed for 3,627 hours before and after constructing ASBs. Traffic conflicts were used as a surrogate for crashes. In total, the study found 644 traffic conflicts. The overall safety effect was not statistically significant: the conflict rate for right-hook conflicts decreased by 6% (p = 0.72), and for left-hook conflicts it increased by 21% (p = 0.26). The results differed at the seven sites, and there were only a few statistically significant results. At one site, the conflict rate of cyclists vs. right-turning vehicles decreased significantly, while it significantly increased at another site. One of the seven sites showed a significant increase in the conflict rate of cyclists vs. left-turning vehicles. A likely explanation is that few conflicts occur during the early green phase. In addition, the use rate of the ASB was low (0–2.7%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"1731 - 1749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1960661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1960661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

高级停车箱(asb)(即在停车线前为骑自行车的人标记的区域)被认为是降低骑自行车者和右转车辆之间碰撞风险的潜在手段。本研究使用对数赔率法估计了信号交叉口asb的安全效应。7个信号交叉口在asb建设前后拍摄了3627小时。交通冲突被用来代替交通事故。该研究总共发现了644起交通冲突。总体安全效果无统计学意义:右勾拳冲突的冲突率降低了6% (p = 0.72),左勾拳冲突的冲突率增加了21% (p = 0.26)。结果在七个地点有所不同,只有少数具有统计学意义的结果。在一个地点,骑自行车者与右转车辆的冲突率显著降低,而在另一个地点则显著增加。其中一个地点显示骑车者与左转车辆的冲突率显著增加。一个可能的解释是,在早期的绿色阶段很少发生冲突。此外,ASB的使用率较低(0-2.7%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced stop boxes and their effect on traffic conflict rates between cyclists and turning vehicles
Abstract Advanced stop boxes (ASBs) (i.e., marked areas for cyclists in front of the stop line) are mentioned as a potential means to reducing the risk of crashes between cyclists and right-turning vehicles. This study estimates the safety effect of ASBs at signalised intersections using the log-odds method. Seven signalised intersections were filmed for 3,627 hours before and after constructing ASBs. Traffic conflicts were used as a surrogate for crashes. In total, the study found 644 traffic conflicts. The overall safety effect was not statistically significant: the conflict rate for right-hook conflicts decreased by 6% (p = 0.72), and for left-hook conflicts it increased by 21% (p = 0.26). The results differed at the seven sites, and there were only a few statistically significant results. At one site, the conflict rate of cyclists vs. right-turning vehicles decreased significantly, while it significantly increased at another site. One of the seven sites showed a significant increase in the conflict rate of cyclists vs. left-turning vehicles. A likely explanation is that few conflicts occur during the early green phase. In addition, the use rate of the ASB was low (0–2.7%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信