液基细胞学与常规细胞学诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的比较:单中心经验

L. Flores-Hernández, Ramírez-Uribe Rd, Villegas-González Lf, Serrano-Arévalo Ml, Cordoba-Gonzalez, Barquet-Muñoz Sa
{"title":"液基细胞学与常规细胞学诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的比较:单中心经验","authors":"L. Flores-Hernández, Ramírez-Uribe Rd, Villegas-González Lf, Serrano-Arévalo Ml, Cordoba-Gonzalez, Barquet-Muñoz Sa","doi":"10.15744/2454-3284.4.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conclusion: Considering no statistically differences in the results and the outlay of LBC, implementation of LBC should be used for molecular-based detection and genotyping when human papillomavirus may offer additional benefits when screening for cervical carcinoma. Introduction: Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer. Screening assays that include the conventional cytology (CC) have a sensitivity and specificity far from optimal; however, liquid-based cytology (LBC) may overcome some limitations. The objective is to compare the screening accuracy of LBC and CC in individuals suspected of having precancerous lesions.","PeriodicalId":91315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquid-Based Cytology Compared to Conventional Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"L. Flores-Hernández, Ramírez-Uribe Rd, Villegas-González Lf, Serrano-Arévalo Ml, Cordoba-Gonzalez, Barquet-Muñoz Sa\",\"doi\":\"10.15744/2454-3284.4.206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conclusion: Considering no statistically differences in the results and the outlay of LBC, implementation of LBC should be used for molecular-based detection and genotyping when human papillomavirus may offer additional benefits when screening for cervical carcinoma. Introduction: Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer. Screening assays that include the conventional cytology (CC) have a sensitivity and specificity far from optimal; however, liquid-based cytology (LBC) may overcome some limitations. The objective is to compare the screening accuracy of LBC and CC in individuals suspected of having precancerous lesions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15744/2454-3284.4.206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15744/2454-3284.4.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结论:考虑到LBC的结果和费用没有统计学差异,当人乳头瘤病毒可能为宫颈癌筛查提供额外的好处时,LBC的实施应用于基于分子的检测和基因分型。简介:宫颈癌是第四大常见妇科癌症。包括常规细胞学(CC)在内的筛选试验灵敏度和特异性远未达到最佳水平;然而,液体细胞学(LBC)可以克服一些局限性。目的是比较在怀疑有癌前病变的个体中LBC和CC的筛查准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liquid-Based Cytology Compared to Conventional Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Experience
Conclusion: Considering no statistically differences in the results and the outlay of LBC, implementation of LBC should be used for molecular-based detection and genotyping when human papillomavirus may offer additional benefits when screening for cervical carcinoma. Introduction: Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer. Screening assays that include the conventional cytology (CC) have a sensitivity and specificity far from optimal; however, liquid-based cytology (LBC) may overcome some limitations. The objective is to compare the screening accuracy of LBC and CC in individuals suspected of having precancerous lesions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信