伊丽莎白一世受审:乔治·普特纳姆辩白中的法医修辞

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Sarah H. Case
{"title":"伊丽莎白一世受审:乔治·普特纳姆辩白中的法医修辞","authors":"Sarah H. Case","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay considers a lesser-known manuscript tract by the English author George Puttenham in light of debates over the execution of Mary Queen of Scots. Known as the Justification, this document survives in numerous contemporary manuscript witnesses, and it has usually been taken by scholars as a straightforward defense of Queen Elizabeth for ordering Mary’s execution. Sarah Case suggests otherwise through an analysis of the tract’s rhetorical structure. She reads the Justification in relation to the Elizabethan succession issue, arguing that forensic rhetoric allowed Puttenham to skirt parliamentary restrictions against speech and writing on the subject. This strategy, as well as the complexity of the issues surrounding it, comes into fuller view, owing to new manuscript evidence about Puttenham’s tract.","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elizabeth I on Trial: Forensic Rhetoric in George Puttenham’s Justification\",\"authors\":\"Sarah H. Case\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hlq.2022.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay considers a lesser-known manuscript tract by the English author George Puttenham in light of debates over the execution of Mary Queen of Scots. Known as the Justification, this document survives in numerous contemporary manuscript witnesses, and it has usually been taken by scholars as a straightforward defense of Queen Elizabeth for ordering Mary’s execution. Sarah Case suggests otherwise through an analysis of the tract’s rhetorical structure. She reads the Justification in relation to the Elizabethan succession issue, arguing that forensic rhetoric allowed Puttenham to skirt parliamentary restrictions against speech and writing on the subject. This strategy, as well as the complexity of the issues surrounding it, comes into fuller view, owing to new manuscript evidence about Puttenham’s tract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2022.0015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2022.0015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了英国作家乔治·普特纳姆(George Puttenham)在苏格兰玛丽女王被处决的争论中所写的一篇鲜为人知的手稿。这份文件被称为《辩护书》,在许多同时代的手稿中幸存下来,学者们通常将其视为伊丽莎白女王下令处决玛丽的直接辩护。Sarah Case通过对文章修辞结构的分析得出了相反的结论。她阅读了与伊丽莎白时代的继承问题有关的辩护,认为法庭修辞允许Puttenham绕过议会对该主题的言论和写作的限制。这一策略,以及围绕它的问题的复杂性,进入更全面的视野,由于新的手稿证据的Puttenham的小册子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elizabeth I on Trial: Forensic Rhetoric in George Puttenham’s Justification
abstract:This essay considers a lesser-known manuscript tract by the English author George Puttenham in light of debates over the execution of Mary Queen of Scots. Known as the Justification, this document survives in numerous contemporary manuscript witnesses, and it has usually been taken by scholars as a straightforward defense of Queen Elizabeth for ordering Mary’s execution. Sarah Case suggests otherwise through an analysis of the tract’s rhetorical structure. She reads the Justification in relation to the Elizabethan succession issue, arguing that forensic rhetoric allowed Puttenham to skirt parliamentary restrictions against speech and writing on the subject. This strategy, as well as the complexity of the issues surrounding it, comes into fuller view, owing to new manuscript evidence about Puttenham’s tract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信