里海公约:新地位但旧分歧?

IF 0.5 4区社会学 Q3 LAW

Review of Central and East European Law Pub Date : 2019-12-04 DOI:10.1163/15730352-04404001

P.-E. Thévenin

{"title":"里海公约:新地位但旧分歧?","authors":"P.-E. Thévenin","doi":"10.1163/15730352-04404001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new Caspian Sea Convention signed in Aktau, Kazakhstan, on the 12th of August 2018 puts an end to almost three decades of legal uncertainty and complex negotiations that were by the question of the exploitation of the rich Caspian seabed. Although the significance of the Aktau Convention should not be understated, this article will show that rather than providing a new legal framework for the Caspian Sea, it validates the North Caspian Sea agreements previously signed between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia. As a result, these countries stand to benefit the most from this convention, as opposed to Iran, whose propositions do not appear in the final version of the instrument.","PeriodicalId":42845,"journal":{"name":"Review of Central and East European Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"437-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Caspian Sea Convention: New Status but Old Divisions?\",\"authors\":\"P.-E. Thévenin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15730352-04404001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new Caspian Sea Convention signed in Aktau, Kazakhstan, on the 12th of August 2018 puts an end to almost three decades of legal uncertainty and complex negotiations that were by the question of the exploitation of the rich Caspian seabed. Although the significance of the Aktau Convention should not be understated, this article will show that rather than providing a new legal framework for the Caspian Sea, it validates the North Caspian Sea agreements previously signed between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia. As a result, these countries stand to benefit the most from this convention, as opposed to Iran, whose propositions do not appear in the final version of the instrument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Central and East European Law\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"437-463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Central and East European Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04404001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Central and East European Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04404001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

2018年8月12日，在哈萨克斯坦阿克套签署的新《里海公约》结束了近三十年来因开采丰富的里海海底问题而产生的法律不确定性和复杂的谈判。虽然《阿克套公约》的重要性不应被低估，但本文将表明，它不是为里海提供一个新的法律框架，而是验证了阿塞拜疆、哈萨克斯坦和俄罗斯之前签署的北里海协议。因此，这些国家将从这项公约中获益最多，而伊朗则相反，伊朗的主张没有出现在该文书的最终版本中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Caspian Sea Convention: New Status but Old Divisions?

The new Caspian Sea Convention signed in Aktau, Kazakhstan, on the 12th of August 2018 puts an end to almost three decades of legal uncertainty and complex negotiations that were by the question of the exploitation of the rich Caspian seabed. Although the significance of the Aktau Convention should not be understated, this article will show that rather than providing a new legal framework for the Caspian Sea, it validates the North Caspian Sea agreements previously signed between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia. As a result, these countries stand to benefit the most from this convention, as opposed to Iran, whose propositions do not appear in the final version of the instrument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Review of Central and East European Law LAW-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Review of Central and East European Law critically examines issues of legal doctrine and practice in the CIS and CEE regions. An important aspect of this is, for example, the harmonization of legal principles and rules; another facet is the legal impact of the intertwining of domestic economies, on the one hand, with regional economies and the processes of international trade and investment on the other. The Review offers a forum for discussion of topical questions of public and private law. The Review encourages comparative research; it is hoped that, in this way, additional insights in legal developments can be communicated to those interested in questions, not only of law, but also of politics, economics, and of society of the CIS and CEE countries.