{"title":"审计师对重要性的应用:来自英国的洞察","authors":"R. Quick, M. Zaman, Gihani Mandalawattha","doi":"10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.","PeriodicalId":47566,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Forum","volume":"119 1","pages":"24 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditors’ application of materiality: insight from the UK\",\"authors\":\"R. Quick, M. Zaman, Gihani Mandalawattha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Forum","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Auditors’ application of materiality: insight from the UK
ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.
期刊介绍:
Accounting Forum publishes authoritative yet accessible articles which advance our knowledge of theory and practice in all areas of accounting, business finance and related subjects. The journal both promotes greater understanding of the role of business in the global environment, and provides a forum for the intellectual exchange of academic research in business fields, particularly in the accounting profession. Covering a range of topical issues in accounting, business finance and related fields, Accounting Forum''s main areas of interest are: accounting theory; auditing; financial accounting; finance and accounting education; management accounting; small business; social and environmental accounting; and taxation. Of equal interest to practitioners, academics, and students, each issue of the journal includes peer-reviewed articles, notes and comments section.