审计师对重要性的应用:来自英国的洞察

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
R. Quick, M. Zaman, Gihani Mandalawattha
{"title":"审计师对重要性的应用:来自英国的洞察","authors":"R. Quick, M. Zaman, Gihani Mandalawattha","doi":"10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.","PeriodicalId":47566,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Forum","volume":"119 1","pages":"24 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditors’ application of materiality: insight from the UK\",\"authors\":\"R. Quick, M. Zaman, Gihani Mandalawattha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Forum","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.2019958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

审计报告改革的目的是减少信息差距,提高审计透明度。尽管存在的标准和指导方针的重要性研究在实践中是有限的,这篇文章检查了审计师的应用重要性披露在他们的报告在英国引入修订后的审计报告标准。我们提供了使用的实际基准和实质性理由的证据。此外,我们还研究了审计事务所和行业在重要性实践方面的差异,以及向审计委员会报告的重要性。我们发现,重要性披露通常符合监管规定,并符合审计师进行额外披露以减少信息差距的愿望。然而,披露的性质和程度各不相同,这可能是由于可能担心使审计的主观性过于明显,从而限制了报告的有用性。总的来说,修订后的准则提高了透明度,但在审计报告中提供更有意义的披露方面仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditors’ application of materiality: insight from the UK
ABSTRACT Changes to the auditors’ reports aim to reduce the information gap and make auditing more transparent. Despite the existence of standards and guidelines research on materiality in practice is limited, this article examines auditors’ application of materiality as disclosed in their reports following the introduction of the revised standard on auditors’ reports in the UK. We provide evidence on actual benchmarks used and materiality rationales. Additionally, we also examine audit firm and industry variations in materiality practices as well as materiality reporting to audit committees. We find materiality disclosures are generally compliant with regulation and consistent with a desire to reduce the information gap auditors make additional disclosures. However, there is variation in the nature and extent of disclosures, possibly due to potential concerns about making the subjectivity of auditing too apparent, which can limit the reports’ usefulness. Overall, the revised standard has enhanced transparency, but there is room for improvement in providing more meaningful disclosures in the auditors’ reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Forum
Accounting Forum BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Accounting Forum publishes authoritative yet accessible articles which advance our knowledge of theory and practice in all areas of accounting, business finance and related subjects. The journal both promotes greater understanding of the role of business in the global environment, and provides a forum for the intellectual exchange of academic research in business fields, particularly in the accounting profession. Covering a range of topical issues in accounting, business finance and related fields, Accounting Forum''s main areas of interest are: accounting theory; auditing; financial accounting; finance and accounting education; management accounting; small business; social and environmental accounting; and taxation. Of equal interest to practitioners, academics, and students, each issue of the journal includes peer-reviewed articles, notes and comments section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信