- Book学术

发布求助

文献互助智能选刊最新文献

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico Pub Date : 2020-08-21 DOI:10.7764/67.5

Daniela Losiggio

引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的工作旨在恢复Warburg的方法的问题。首先，我们将分析Jacob Burckhardt和Robert Vischer在Warburguian关于研究文化现象的心理学建议中的影响。然后，我们将发现Warburg从这种方法转向了一种新的关注，即非个人力量产生历史文化感觉的方式。正如我们在这里提出的，一方面，这一运动是由对唯美主义和历史主义的批判的配置所调解的(在1900年通过与安德烈·乔勒的著名书信交流明确表示);另一方面，它可以让我们更好地理解生存悲情的概念，以及受理查德·西蒙(Richard Semon)影响的沃伯格(Warburguian)对发展社会记忆理论的兴趣。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Aby Warburg y el pathos superviviente. De la psicología a la memoria social

The present work aims to restore the problem of the Warburg’s method. First, we will analyse the influence of Jacob Burckhardt and Robert Vischer in the Warburguian proposal of a psychology for the approach of cultural phenomena. Then, we will discover that Warburg moves from this approach towards a new concern for the way in which impersonal forces produce historical-cultural senses. As we propose here, on the one hand, this movement is mediated by the configuration of a critique towards aestheticism and historicism (made explicit in 1900 through a famous epistolary exchange with Andre Jolles); on the other hand, it allows a better understanding of the notion of surviving pathos as well as the Warburguian interest for developing a theory of social memory, influenced by Richard Semon.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 weeks

期刊介绍： The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.