双重诊断话语在澳大利亚的种子

Bridget Roberts
{"title":"双重诊断话语在澳大利亚的种子","authors":"Bridget Roberts","doi":"10.1080/17523281.2012.741611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of ‘dual diagnosis’, the co-occurrence of mental health and substance use problems, while far from new in human experience, has become in recent decades a focus for research, policy and practice internationally. This article inquires into the emergence of dual diagnosis discourse in a particular place and time, the State of Victoria, Australia in the early 1990s, and reflects on implications for current health service practice and administration. An interpretive approach draws upon the research literatures, analysis of policy and related documents and interviews with a purposive sample of 19 stakeholders, conducted during 2010 and 2011. Qualitative analysis indicated that the main initial impetus was a perceived increase in the exclusion of people with severe concurrent mental illness and substance use problems from specialist services. Contributing factors included deinstitutionalization, the restructuring of government funding and professional interests. We conclude that ‘dual diagnosis’ off...","PeriodicalId":88592,"journal":{"name":"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis","volume":"31 1","pages":"325-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The seeds of dual diagnosis discourse in an Australian state\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17523281.2012.741611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of ‘dual diagnosis’, the co-occurrence of mental health and substance use problems, while far from new in human experience, has become in recent decades a focus for research, policy and practice internationally. This article inquires into the emergence of dual diagnosis discourse in a particular place and time, the State of Victoria, Australia in the early 1990s, and reflects on implications for current health service practice and administration. An interpretive approach draws upon the research literatures, analysis of policy and related documents and interviews with a purposive sample of 19 stakeholders, conducted during 2010 and 2011. Qualitative analysis indicated that the main initial impetus was a perceived increase in the exclusion of people with severe concurrent mental illness and substance use problems from specialist services. Contributing factors included deinstitutionalization, the restructuring of government funding and professional interests. We conclude that ‘dual diagnosis’ off...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"325-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17523281.2012.741611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health and substance use : dual diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17523281.2012.741611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

"双重诊断"问题,即精神健康和药物使用问题同时出现的问题,虽然在人类经验中并不新鲜,但在最近几十年中已成为国际研究、政策和实践的重点。本文探讨了双重诊断话语在特定地点和时间的出现,即20世纪90年代初澳大利亚维多利亚州,并反映了对当前卫生服务实践和管理的影响。解释性方法借鉴了研究文献、政策分析和相关文件,以及2010年至2011年期间对19个利益相关者进行的有目的样本访谈。定性分析表明,最初的主要推动力是,人们认为越来越多同时患有严重精神疾病和药物使用问题的人被排除在专家服务之外。促成因素包括去机构化、政府资金结构调整和专业利益。我们的结论是“双重诊断”失败了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The seeds of dual diagnosis discourse in an Australian state
The problem of ‘dual diagnosis’, the co-occurrence of mental health and substance use problems, while far from new in human experience, has become in recent decades a focus for research, policy and practice internationally. This article inquires into the emergence of dual diagnosis discourse in a particular place and time, the State of Victoria, Australia in the early 1990s, and reflects on implications for current health service practice and administration. An interpretive approach draws upon the research literatures, analysis of policy and related documents and interviews with a purposive sample of 19 stakeholders, conducted during 2010 and 2011. Qualitative analysis indicated that the main initial impetus was a perceived increase in the exclusion of people with severe concurrent mental illness and substance use problems from specialist services. Contributing factors included deinstitutionalization, the restructuring of government funding and professional interests. We conclude that ‘dual diagnosis’ off...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信