《消费者法的经济分析:立法如何在不保护消费者的情况下伤害穷人》(消费者法的经济分析:立法如何在不保护消费者的情况下伤害穷人)

B. Bodart
{"title":"《消费者法的经济分析:立法如何在不保护消费者的情况下伤害穷人》(消费者法的经济分析:立法如何在不保护消费者的情况下伤害穷人)","authors":"B. Bodart","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2870931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portuguese Abstract: O Direito do Consumidor e tradicionalmente compreendido no Brasil como unico mecanismo capaz de proteger o consumidor como sujeito vulneravel no mercado de consumo. Sob essa logica, multiplicam-se leis e regulamentos destinados a tutelar os interesses dos consumidores. Entretanto, as principais tecnicas adotadas falham em atingir os objetivos propostos, concentram mercados e excluem consumidores de menor poder aquisitivo, dentre outras consequencias nao intencionais. O presente artigo analisa pesquisas empiricas para demonstrar os problemas que essas tecnicas apresentam. Ao final, sao propostas alternativas ao sistema de protecao ao consumidor centralizado na legislacao.English Abstract: Consumer Law is traditionally regarded in Brazil as the only mechanism able to protect consumers as vulnerable actors within the market. Following this rationale, the number of laws and regulations, intended to safeguard consumers’ interests, continues to grow. However, the main regulatory techniques: fail to achieve the proposed goals, concentrate markets, and exclude low-income consumers from them, on top of other unintended consequences. The paper identifies issues with these techniques based on empirical research and elaborates on alternatives to the state-centered consumer protection system.","PeriodicalId":90732,"journal":{"name":"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uma Análise Econômica Do Direito Do Consumidor: Como Leis Consumeristas Prejudicam Os Mais Pobres Sem Beneficiar Consumidores (An Economic Analysis of Consumer Law: How Legislation Harms the Poor without Protecting the Consumers)\",\"authors\":\"B. Bodart\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2870931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portuguese Abstract: O Direito do Consumidor e tradicionalmente compreendido no Brasil como unico mecanismo capaz de proteger o consumidor como sujeito vulneravel no mercado de consumo. Sob essa logica, multiplicam-se leis e regulamentos destinados a tutelar os interesses dos consumidores. Entretanto, as principais tecnicas adotadas falham em atingir os objetivos propostos, concentram mercados e excluem consumidores de menor poder aquisitivo, dentre outras consequencias nao intencionais. O presente artigo analisa pesquisas empiricas para demonstrar os problemas que essas tecnicas apresentam. Ao final, sao propostas alternativas ao sistema de protecao ao consumidor centralizado na legislacao.English Abstract: Consumer Law is traditionally regarded in Brazil as the only mechanism able to protect consumers as vulnerable actors within the market. Following this rationale, the number of laws and regulations, intended to safeguard consumers’ interests, continues to grow. However, the main regulatory techniques: fail to achieve the proposed goals, concentrate markets, and exclude low-income consumers from them, on top of other unintended consequences. The paper identifies issues with these techniques based on empirical research and elaborates on alternatives to the state-centered consumer protection system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford technology law review : STLR : an online high-technology law journal from Stanford Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在巴西,消费者法传统上被理解为唯一能够保护消费者作为消费市场中脆弱主体的机制。在这种逻辑下,旨在保护消费者利益的法律法规成倍增加。然而,采用的主要技术未能实现拟议的目标,集中市场,排除购买力较低的消费者,以及其他意想不到的后果。本文分析了实证研究,以证明这些技术存在的问题。最后,提出了以立法为中心的消费者保护体系的替代方案。在巴西,消费者法传统上被认为是能够保护消费者作为市场中的弱势行动者的唯一机制。根据这一理由,旨在保障消费者利益的法律和条例的数量继续增加。然而,主要的监管技术:未能实现拟议的目标,集中市场,并将低收入消费者排除在这些目标之外,以及其他意想不到的后果。本文在实证研究的基础上确定了这些技术的问题,并阐述了以国家为中心的消费者保护制度的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uma Análise Econômica Do Direito Do Consumidor: Como Leis Consumeristas Prejudicam Os Mais Pobres Sem Beneficiar Consumidores (An Economic Analysis of Consumer Law: How Legislation Harms the Poor without Protecting the Consumers)
Portuguese Abstract: O Direito do Consumidor e tradicionalmente compreendido no Brasil como unico mecanismo capaz de proteger o consumidor como sujeito vulneravel no mercado de consumo. Sob essa logica, multiplicam-se leis e regulamentos destinados a tutelar os interesses dos consumidores. Entretanto, as principais tecnicas adotadas falham em atingir os objetivos propostos, concentram mercados e excluem consumidores de menor poder aquisitivo, dentre outras consequencias nao intencionais. O presente artigo analisa pesquisas empiricas para demonstrar os problemas que essas tecnicas apresentam. Ao final, sao propostas alternativas ao sistema de protecao ao consumidor centralizado na legislacao.English Abstract: Consumer Law is traditionally regarded in Brazil as the only mechanism able to protect consumers as vulnerable actors within the market. Following this rationale, the number of laws and regulations, intended to safeguard consumers’ interests, continues to grow. However, the main regulatory techniques: fail to achieve the proposed goals, concentrate markets, and exclude low-income consumers from them, on top of other unintended consequences. The paper identifies issues with these techniques based on empirical research and elaborates on alternatives to the state-centered consumer protection system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信