单轴纤维-聚合物复合材料层间断裂分析

S. Hashemi, A. Kinloch, J. M. Williams
{"title":"单轴纤维-聚合物复合材料层间断裂分析","authors":"S. Hashemi, A. Kinloch, J. M. Williams","doi":"10.1098/rspa.1990.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important mechanical properties of a fibre-polymer composite is its resistance to delamination. The presence of delaminations may lead not only to complete fracture but even partial delaminations will lead to a loss of stiffness, which can be a very important design consideration. Because delamination may be regarded as crack propagation then an obvious scheme for characterizing this phenomenon has been via a fracture mechanics approach. There is, therefore, an extensive literature on the use of fracture mechanics to ascertain the interlaminar fracture energies, Gc, for various fibre-polymer composites using different test geometries to yield mode I, mode II and mixed mode I/II values of Gc. Nevertheless, problems of consistency and discussions on the accuracy of such results abound. This paper describes a detailed study of the methods of analysing the experimental data obtained from fracture mechanics tests using double-cantilever beam, end loaded split and end notched flexure specimens. It is shown that to get consistent and accurate values of Gc it is necessary to consider aspects of the tests such as the end rotation and deflection of the crack tip, the effective shortening of the beam due to large displacements of the arms, and the stiffening of the beam due to the presence of the end blocks bonded to the specimens. Analytical methods for ascertaining the various correction constants and factors are described and are successfully applied to the results obtained from three different fibre-polymer composites. These composites exhibit different types of fracture behaviour and illustrate the wide range of effects that must be considered when values of the interlaminar fracture energies, free from artefacts from the test method and the analysis method, are required.","PeriodicalId":20605,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"173 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"389","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The analysis of interlaminar fracture in uniaxial fibre-polymer composites\",\"authors\":\"S. Hashemi, A. Kinloch, J. M. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspa.1990.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most important mechanical properties of a fibre-polymer composite is its resistance to delamination. The presence of delaminations may lead not only to complete fracture but even partial delaminations will lead to a loss of stiffness, which can be a very important design consideration. Because delamination may be regarded as crack propagation then an obvious scheme for characterizing this phenomenon has been via a fracture mechanics approach. There is, therefore, an extensive literature on the use of fracture mechanics to ascertain the interlaminar fracture energies, Gc, for various fibre-polymer composites using different test geometries to yield mode I, mode II and mixed mode I/II values of Gc. Nevertheless, problems of consistency and discussions on the accuracy of such results abound. This paper describes a detailed study of the methods of analysing the experimental data obtained from fracture mechanics tests using double-cantilever beam, end loaded split and end notched flexure specimens. It is shown that to get consistent and accurate values of Gc it is necessary to consider aspects of the tests such as the end rotation and deflection of the crack tip, the effective shortening of the beam due to large displacements of the arms, and the stiffening of the beam due to the presence of the end blocks bonded to the specimens. Analytical methods for ascertaining the various correction constants and factors are described and are successfully applied to the results obtained from three different fibre-polymer composites. These composites exhibit different types of fracture behaviour and illustrate the wide range of effects that must be considered when values of the interlaminar fracture energies, free from artefacts from the test method and the analysis method, are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"173 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"389\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 389

摘要

纤维-聚合物复合材料最重要的机械性能之一是其抗分层性。分层的存在不仅会导致完全断裂,甚至部分分层也会导致刚度损失,这是一个非常重要的设计考虑因素。由于脱层可以看作是裂纹扩展,因此用断裂力学方法来描述这一现象是一种明显的方法。因此,有大量的文献使用断裂力学来确定各种纤维-聚合物复合材料的层间断裂能,Gc,使用不同的测试几何形状来产生I模式,II模式和I/II混合模式的Gc值。然而,这种结果的一致性问题和准确性的讨论比比皆是。本文详细研究了双悬臂梁、端载劈裂和端缺口弯曲试件断裂力学试验数据的分析方法。结果表明,为了获得一致和准确的Gc值,需要考虑试验的各个方面,如裂纹尖端的末端旋转和挠度,由于臂的大位移而导致的梁的有效缩短,以及由于端块与试件粘结而导致的梁的加强。描述了确定各种校正常数和因子的分析方法,并成功地应用于三种不同的纤维-聚合物复合材料的结果。这些复合材料表现出不同类型的断裂行为,并说明了在需要测试方法和分析方法中不受人工影响的层间断裂能值时必须考虑的广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The analysis of interlaminar fracture in uniaxial fibre-polymer composites
One of the most important mechanical properties of a fibre-polymer composite is its resistance to delamination. The presence of delaminations may lead not only to complete fracture but even partial delaminations will lead to a loss of stiffness, which can be a very important design consideration. Because delamination may be regarded as crack propagation then an obvious scheme for characterizing this phenomenon has been via a fracture mechanics approach. There is, therefore, an extensive literature on the use of fracture mechanics to ascertain the interlaminar fracture energies, Gc, for various fibre-polymer composites using different test geometries to yield mode I, mode II and mixed mode I/II values of Gc. Nevertheless, problems of consistency and discussions on the accuracy of such results abound. This paper describes a detailed study of the methods of analysing the experimental data obtained from fracture mechanics tests using double-cantilever beam, end loaded split and end notched flexure specimens. It is shown that to get consistent and accurate values of Gc it is necessary to consider aspects of the tests such as the end rotation and deflection of the crack tip, the effective shortening of the beam due to large displacements of the arms, and the stiffening of the beam due to the presence of the end blocks bonded to the specimens. Analytical methods for ascertaining the various correction constants and factors are described and are successfully applied to the results obtained from three different fibre-polymer composites. These composites exhibit different types of fracture behaviour and illustrate the wide range of effects that must be considered when values of the interlaminar fracture energies, free from artefacts from the test method and the analysis method, are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信