风险认知如何促使吸烟者完全转向无烟烟草产品?一项四国队列研究

K. Fischer, Steve Roulet, A. Surducan, Mario Colombo, P. Magnani
{"title":"风险认知如何促使吸烟者完全转向无烟烟草产品?一项四国队列研究","authors":"K. Fischer, Steve Roulet, A. Surducan, Mario Colombo, P. Magnani","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Background The perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of a smoke-free tobacco product relative to combustible tobacco products may influence its acceptance and use patterns among adult smokers and therefore impact public health. We analyzed whether and how the RF and/or RH of the heated tobacco product (HTP) IQOS™ impacted “exclusive” (100%) IQOS™ use in Japan, Italy, Germany, and Russia. Methods Between 2016 and 2020, adult participants from longitudinal IQOS™ user cohorts in Japan (N = 6257), Italy (N = 8137), Germany (N = 8474), and Russia (N = 7231) repeatedly indicated the reasons for using IQOS™, including reasons referring to RF and RH, during their first 48 weeks in the cohort. Logistic and Cox regression were used to analyze the relationships between RF and/or RH indications for using IQOS™ and exclusive or stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Results At week 48, exclusive IQOS™ use in Japan (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89), Italy (OR = 3.35), Germany (OR = 3.48), and Russia (OR = 3.05) was more likely among participants who more frequently (highest vs. lowest category of number of RF and/or RH indications) indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™. In Japan, where other HTPs were also marketed, this was also true for the overall HTP category. Also, in Japan where RF and RH could be indicated separately as reasons for using IQOS™, indicating RH (OR = 2.92) compared to RF (OR = 1.81) resulted in a greater likelihood of exclusive IQOS™ use within the highest category of RF or RH indications. In Japan (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74), Italy (HR = 0.80), Germany (HR = 0.72), and Russia (HR = 0.85), IQOS™ users who indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™ had a lower risk of becoming a stable nonexclusive than stable exclusive IQOS™ user as well as a 10–25% lower number of weeks until reaching stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Conclusions Perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of IQOS™ have a significant impact on IQOS™ users’ switching to exclusive IQOS™ use and the acceleration of stable exclusive IQOS™ use. This may also be true for the overall HTP category. Moreover, perceived RH of IQOS™ seems to be a stronger driver for exclusive IQOS™ use than perceived RF. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 50–64]","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"50 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do Risk Perceptions Drive Smokers to Completely Switch to a Smoke-Free Tobacco Product (IQOS™)? A Four-Country Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"K. Fischer, Steve Roulet, A. Surducan, Mario Colombo, P. Magnani\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/cttr-2023-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Background The perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of a smoke-free tobacco product relative to combustible tobacco products may influence its acceptance and use patterns among adult smokers and therefore impact public health. We analyzed whether and how the RF and/or RH of the heated tobacco product (HTP) IQOS™ impacted “exclusive” (100%) IQOS™ use in Japan, Italy, Germany, and Russia. Methods Between 2016 and 2020, adult participants from longitudinal IQOS™ user cohorts in Japan (N = 6257), Italy (N = 8137), Germany (N = 8474), and Russia (N = 7231) repeatedly indicated the reasons for using IQOS™, including reasons referring to RF and RH, during their first 48 weeks in the cohort. Logistic and Cox regression were used to analyze the relationships between RF and/or RH indications for using IQOS™ and exclusive or stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Results At week 48, exclusive IQOS™ use in Japan (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89), Italy (OR = 3.35), Germany (OR = 3.48), and Russia (OR = 3.05) was more likely among participants who more frequently (highest vs. lowest category of number of RF and/or RH indications) indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™. In Japan, where other HTPs were also marketed, this was also true for the overall HTP category. Also, in Japan where RF and RH could be indicated separately as reasons for using IQOS™, indicating RH (OR = 2.92) compared to RF (OR = 1.81) resulted in a greater likelihood of exclusive IQOS™ use within the highest category of RF or RH indications. In Japan (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74), Italy (HR = 0.80), Germany (HR = 0.72), and Russia (HR = 0.85), IQOS™ users who indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™ had a lower risk of becoming a stable nonexclusive than stable exclusive IQOS™ user as well as a 10–25% lower number of weeks until reaching stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Conclusions Perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of IQOS™ have a significant impact on IQOS™ users’ switching to exclusive IQOS™ use and the acceleration of stable exclusive IQOS™ use. This may also be true for the overall HTP category. Moreover, perceived RH of IQOS™ seems to be a stronger driver for exclusive IQOS™ use than perceived RF. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 50–64]\",\"PeriodicalId\":10723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2023-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与可燃烟草制品相比,人们认为无烟烟草制品有害化学物质(RF)的形成减少或危害风险(RH)降低,可能会影响成年吸烟者对无烟烟草制品的接受程度和使用模式,从而影响公共卫生。我们分析了加热烟草产品(HTP) IQOS™的RF和/或RH是否以及如何影响日本,意大利,德国和俄罗斯的“独家”(100%)IQOS™使用。方法在2016年至2020年期间,来自日本(N = 6257)、意大利(N = 8137)、德国(N = 8474)和俄罗斯(N = 7231)纵向IQOS™用户队列的成年参与者在队列的前48周内反复表示使用IQOS™的原因,包括RF和RH相关的原因。采用Logistic和Cox回归分析使用IQOS™的RF和/或RH适应症与单独或稳定单独使用IQOS™之间的关系。结果在第48周,在日本(优势比[OR] = 1.89)、意大利(OR = 3.35)、德国(OR = 3.48)和俄罗斯(OR = 3.05)中,更频繁(RF和/或RH适应症数量最高与最低类别)将RF和/或RH作为使用IQOS™的原因的参与者更有可能使用IQOS™。在日本,其他http也在市场上销售,整个http类别也是如此。此外,在日本,RF和RH可以单独作为使用IQOS™的原因,与RF (OR = 1.81)相比,RH (OR = 2.92)导致在RF或RH适应症的最高类别中使用IQOS™的可能性更大。在日本(风险比[HR] = 0.74)、意大利(HR = 0.80)、德国(HR = 0.72)和俄罗斯(HR = 0.85),将RF和/或RH作为使用IQOS™原因的IQOS™用户成为稳定的非排他性IQOS™用户的风险低于稳定的排他性IQOS™用户,并且达到稳定的排他性IQOS™使用的周数减少了10-25%。结论:感知到IQOS™有害化学物质(RF)形成的减少或感知到IQOS™危害风险(RH)的降低对IQOS™用户转向独家IQOS™使用和加速稳定的独家IQOS™使用有显著影响。对于整个http类别来说,这可能也是正确的。此外,IQOS™的感知RH似乎比感知RF更强烈地推动了IQOS™的独家使用。(普通发布版。钻头扭矩。尼古丁法规。32 (2023)50-64]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do Risk Perceptions Drive Smokers to Completely Switch to a Smoke-Free Tobacco Product (IQOS™)? A Four-Country Cohort Study
SUMMARY Background The perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of a smoke-free tobacco product relative to combustible tobacco products may influence its acceptance and use patterns among adult smokers and therefore impact public health. We analyzed whether and how the RF and/or RH of the heated tobacco product (HTP) IQOS™ impacted “exclusive” (100%) IQOS™ use in Japan, Italy, Germany, and Russia. Methods Between 2016 and 2020, adult participants from longitudinal IQOS™ user cohorts in Japan (N = 6257), Italy (N = 8137), Germany (N = 8474), and Russia (N = 7231) repeatedly indicated the reasons for using IQOS™, including reasons referring to RF and RH, during their first 48 weeks in the cohort. Logistic and Cox regression were used to analyze the relationships between RF and/or RH indications for using IQOS™ and exclusive or stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Results At week 48, exclusive IQOS™ use in Japan (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89), Italy (OR = 3.35), Germany (OR = 3.48), and Russia (OR = 3.05) was more likely among participants who more frequently (highest vs. lowest category of number of RF and/or RH indications) indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™. In Japan, where other HTPs were also marketed, this was also true for the overall HTP category. Also, in Japan where RF and RH could be indicated separately as reasons for using IQOS™, indicating RH (OR = 2.92) compared to RF (OR = 1.81) resulted in a greater likelihood of exclusive IQOS™ use within the highest category of RF or RH indications. In Japan (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74), Italy (HR = 0.80), Germany (HR = 0.72), and Russia (HR = 0.85), IQOS™ users who indicated RF and/or RH as a reason for using IQOS™ had a lower risk of becoming a stable nonexclusive than stable exclusive IQOS™ user as well as a 10–25% lower number of weeks until reaching stable exclusive IQOS™ use. Conclusions Perceived reduced formation of harmful chemicals (RF) or perceived reduced risk of harm (RH) of IQOS™ have a significant impact on IQOS™ users’ switching to exclusive IQOS™ use and the acceleration of stable exclusive IQOS™ use. This may also be true for the overall HTP category. Moreover, perceived RH of IQOS™ seems to be a stronger driver for exclusive IQOS™ use than perceived RF. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 50–64]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信