{"title":"不同类型直堤围流结构试验研究","authors":"Tao Yu","doi":"10.17762/converter.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As water damage phenomenon of spur dike exists generally, spur dike must be maintained in order to ensure its regulation function, but its structure changed in the process of maintenance. In order to find out flow structure around the spur dike of different pattens, through generalized flume model tests, variation characteristics of water surface profile and flow velocity around the spur dike of five different pattens were analysed. The results show that the straight head had a greater influence than hook head spur dike on the water surface profile, circular cross-section had smaller effects than trapezoidal cross-section spur dike on the water surface profile; Velocity of Choke area and contraction order from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan straight head dike, trapezoidal cross-section and arc straight head dike, arc section and arc straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dike, trapezoidal cross-section arc hook head dike; Cross section vertical velocity distribution from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular straight head dike, arc cross-section and circular straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular hook head dike.","PeriodicalId":10707,"journal":{"name":"CONVERTER","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study on Flow Structure around Spur Dikes of Different Types\",\"authors\":\"Tao Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.17762/converter.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As water damage phenomenon of spur dike exists generally, spur dike must be maintained in order to ensure its regulation function, but its structure changed in the process of maintenance. In order to find out flow structure around the spur dike of different pattens, through generalized flume model tests, variation characteristics of water surface profile and flow velocity around the spur dike of five different pattens were analysed. The results show that the straight head had a greater influence than hook head spur dike on the water surface profile, circular cross-section had smaller effects than trapezoidal cross-section spur dike on the water surface profile; Velocity of Choke area and contraction order from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan straight head dike, trapezoidal cross-section and arc straight head dike, arc section and arc straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dike, trapezoidal cross-section arc hook head dike; Cross section vertical velocity distribution from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular straight head dike, arc cross-section and circular straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular hook head dike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONVERTER\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONVERTER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17762/converter.115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONVERTER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17762/converter.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental Study on Flow Structure around Spur Dikes of Different Types
As water damage phenomenon of spur dike exists generally, spur dike must be maintained in order to ensure its regulation function, but its structure changed in the process of maintenance. In order to find out flow structure around the spur dike of different pattens, through generalized flume model tests, variation characteristics of water surface profile and flow velocity around the spur dike of five different pattens were analysed. The results show that the straight head had a greater influence than hook head spur dike on the water surface profile, circular cross-section had smaller effects than trapezoidal cross-section spur dike on the water surface profile; Velocity of Choke area and contraction order from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan straight head dike, trapezoidal cross-section and arc straight head dike, arc section and arc straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dike, trapezoidal cross-section arc hook head dike; Cross section vertical velocity distribution from large to small is trapezoidal cross-section and fan hook head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular straight head dike, arc cross-section and circular straight head dam, trapezoidal cross-section and circular hook head dike.