黑曲霉在麦麸和稻壳两种培养基上发酵能力的比较研究。

Kadhim H. A Al-Ameri, S. Ali
{"title":"黑曲霉在麦麸和稻壳两种培养基上发酵能力的比较研究。","authors":"Kadhim H. A Al-Ameri, S. Ali","doi":"10.37022/wjcmpr.v5i2.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citric acid is one of the important organic acids in the fields of industry, agriculture, medicine, etc., and it can be obtained in many ways, the best of which is biological methods using microorganisms. The current study aimed to prepare two cheap and environmentally friendly culture media for the purpose of producing citric acid from Aspergillus niger. The two media, one from rice husks and the other from Wheat bran, where a comparison was made between them regarding which is more efficient in supporting the fungus A. niger compared to the standard medium, the best temperature and pH for production were also assessed. \nEight isolates were obtained, all of which produced acid to varying degrees. No.1 was the highest and best in terms of production 3.1 gm/l, followed by isolate No. 2 with an amount of 2.5 g/l. It was observed that the amount of acid produced increased with the increase of the biomass of the fungus. \nThe study showed variable results regarding the production of citric acid from isolates of A. niger, where the wheat bran medium was the best result, where the resulting concentration of acid was 5.1 gm/l, compared to 4.4 g/l for the medium of rice husks. \nThe results showed that the best temperature was 25°C, as it gave a concentration of citric acid of 3.4 g/l, while the best pH was 6 where the concentration of citric acid produced It was 3 grams per liter.the study showed that there were no significant differences with regard to the sugars adopted in this experiment, as it gave significant similar results in terms of the amount of acid produced as well as the biomass of the fungus Aspergillus niger, while ammonium nitrate was the best among the nitrate sources used, with a production quantity of 4 gm/l .","PeriodicalId":23642,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of the ability of the fungus Aspergillus niger on two alternative media, wheat bran and rice husk.\",\"authors\":\"Kadhim H. A Al-Ameri, S. Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.37022/wjcmpr.v5i2.261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citric acid is one of the important organic acids in the fields of industry, agriculture, medicine, etc., and it can be obtained in many ways, the best of which is biological methods using microorganisms. The current study aimed to prepare two cheap and environmentally friendly culture media for the purpose of producing citric acid from Aspergillus niger. The two media, one from rice husks and the other from Wheat bran, where a comparison was made between them regarding which is more efficient in supporting the fungus A. niger compared to the standard medium, the best temperature and pH for production were also assessed. \\nEight isolates were obtained, all of which produced acid to varying degrees. No.1 was the highest and best in terms of production 3.1 gm/l, followed by isolate No. 2 with an amount of 2.5 g/l. It was observed that the amount of acid produced increased with the increase of the biomass of the fungus. \\nThe study showed variable results regarding the production of citric acid from isolates of A. niger, where the wheat bran medium was the best result, where the resulting concentration of acid was 5.1 gm/l, compared to 4.4 g/l for the medium of rice husks. \\nThe results showed that the best temperature was 25°C, as it gave a concentration of citric acid of 3.4 g/l, while the best pH was 6 where the concentration of citric acid produced It was 3 grams per liter.the study showed that there were no significant differences with regard to the sugars adopted in this experiment, as it gave significant similar results in terms of the amount of acid produced as well as the biomass of the fungus Aspergillus niger, while ammonium nitrate was the best among the nitrate sources used, with a production quantity of 4 gm/l .\",\"PeriodicalId\":23642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v5i2.261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v5i2.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

柠檬酸是工业、农业、医药等领域的重要有机酸之一,柠檬酸的制备方法很多,其中最好的是利用微生物的生物方法。本研究旨在为黑曲霉生产柠檬酸制备两种廉价、环保的培养基。两种培养基,一种来自稻壳,另一种来自麦麸,在这两种培养基之间进行了比较,关于与标准培养基相比,哪种培养基更有效地支持黑曲霉,并评估了生产的最佳温度和pH值。分离得到8株不同程度产酸的菌株。1号菌株产量最高,为3.1 g/l,其次是2号菌株,产量为2.5 g/l。结果表明,随着真菌生物量的增加,产酸量也随之增加。该研究显示了黑曲霉分离株生产柠檬酸的不同结果,其中麦麸培养基效果最好,产酸浓度为5.1 g/l,而稻壳培养基的产酸浓度为4.4 g/l。结果表明,最佳温度为25℃,生成的柠檬酸浓度为3.4 g/l;最佳pH为6,生成的柠檬酸浓度为3 g/l。研究表明,本实验所采用的糖类没有显著差异,在产酸量和真菌黑曲霉生物量方面均有显著相似的结果,而硝酸铵是所使用的硝酸盐源中最好的,产量为4 gm/l。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of the ability of the fungus Aspergillus niger on two alternative media, wheat bran and rice husk.
Citric acid is one of the important organic acids in the fields of industry, agriculture, medicine, etc., and it can be obtained in many ways, the best of which is biological methods using microorganisms. The current study aimed to prepare two cheap and environmentally friendly culture media for the purpose of producing citric acid from Aspergillus niger. The two media, one from rice husks and the other from Wheat bran, where a comparison was made between them regarding which is more efficient in supporting the fungus A. niger compared to the standard medium, the best temperature and pH for production were also assessed. Eight isolates were obtained, all of which produced acid to varying degrees. No.1 was the highest and best in terms of production 3.1 gm/l, followed by isolate No. 2 with an amount of 2.5 g/l. It was observed that the amount of acid produced increased with the increase of the biomass of the fungus. The study showed variable results regarding the production of citric acid from isolates of A. niger, where the wheat bran medium was the best result, where the resulting concentration of acid was 5.1 gm/l, compared to 4.4 g/l for the medium of rice husks. The results showed that the best temperature was 25°C, as it gave a concentration of citric acid of 3.4 g/l, while the best pH was 6 where the concentration of citric acid produced It was 3 grams per liter.the study showed that there were no significant differences with regard to the sugars adopted in this experiment, as it gave significant similar results in terms of the amount of acid produced as well as the biomass of the fungus Aspergillus niger, while ammonium nitrate was the best among the nitrate sources used, with a production quantity of 4 gm/l .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信