公共基础设施项目风险处理选择多样性有限

Q3 Engineering
Vorgers, de Groot, van Buiten, Volker
{"title":"公共基础设施项目风险处理选择多样性有限","authors":"Vorgers, de Groot, van Buiten, Volker","doi":"10.25219/epoj.2022.00105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In public infrastructure projects, risks can emerge quickly due to its external\nuncertainties and interdependencies among a large number of stakeholders. Scholars still debate whether the current approach of risk management is dynamic enough to safeguard project objectives in such public environments. Because of little empirical evidence that explains how and why Project Management Teams (PMTs) select a specific risk treatment, we aim to characterize risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects. Based on document reviews and semi-structured interviews with PMT members and their executives of a Dutch project-oriented public infrastructure agency, it was found that the diversity in risk treatment selection is limited and risk treatment in public infrastructure projects focuses on controlling risk predominantly through preventive control measures. Although PMTs also intentionally control risk through preventive measures, the decision to do so is often implicitly taken and constitutes an unwitting routine that PMTs seem to have developed due to a risk-averse organizational culture. We conclude with providing directions to improve risk management practices and enable more diversity in risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects.","PeriodicalId":36081,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Project Organization Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Diversity in risk treatment selection in public infrastructure projects\",\"authors\":\"Vorgers, de Groot, van Buiten, Volker\",\"doi\":\"10.25219/epoj.2022.00105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In public infrastructure projects, risks can emerge quickly due to its external\\nuncertainties and interdependencies among a large number of stakeholders. Scholars still debate whether the current approach of risk management is dynamic enough to safeguard project objectives in such public environments. Because of little empirical evidence that explains how and why Project Management Teams (PMTs) select a specific risk treatment, we aim to characterize risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects. Based on document reviews and semi-structured interviews with PMT members and their executives of a Dutch project-oriented public infrastructure agency, it was found that the diversity in risk treatment selection is limited and risk treatment in public infrastructure projects focuses on controlling risk predominantly through preventive control measures. Although PMTs also intentionally control risk through preventive measures, the decision to do so is often implicitly taken and constitutes an unwitting routine that PMTs seem to have developed due to a risk-averse organizational culture. We conclude with providing directions to improve risk management practices and enable more diversity in risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Project Organization Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Project Organization Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25219/epoj.2022.00105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Project Organization Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25219/epoj.2022.00105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共基础设施项目中,由于其外部不确定性和大量利益相关者之间的相互依赖性,风险可能很快出现。学者们仍在争论当前的风险管理方法是否足够动态,以确保在这样的公共环境中实现项目目标。由于很少有经验证据解释项目管理团队(pmt)如何以及为什么选择特定的风险处理,我们的目标是描述pmt在公共基础设施项目中的风险处理选择。基于文献回顾和对荷兰某项目导向的公共基础设施机构的PMT成员及其高管的半结构化访谈,我们发现风险处理选择的多样性有限,公共基础设施项目的风险处理主要侧重于通过预防性控制措施来控制风险。虽然pmt也有意通过预防措施来控制风险,但这样做的决定往往是隐含的,并且构成了pmt似乎由于厌恶风险的组织文化而发展起来的不知情的常规。最后,我们提供了改进风险管理实践的方向,并使pmt在公共基础设施项目中的风险处理选择更加多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited Diversity in risk treatment selection in public infrastructure projects
In public infrastructure projects, risks can emerge quickly due to its external uncertainties and interdependencies among a large number of stakeholders. Scholars still debate whether the current approach of risk management is dynamic enough to safeguard project objectives in such public environments. Because of little empirical evidence that explains how and why Project Management Teams (PMTs) select a specific risk treatment, we aim to characterize risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects. Based on document reviews and semi-structured interviews with PMT members and their executives of a Dutch project-oriented public infrastructure agency, it was found that the diversity in risk treatment selection is limited and risk treatment in public infrastructure projects focuses on controlling risk predominantly through preventive control measures. Although PMTs also intentionally control risk through preventive measures, the decision to do so is often implicitly taken and constitutes an unwitting routine that PMTs seem to have developed due to a risk-averse organizational culture. We conclude with providing directions to improve risk management practices and enable more diversity in risk treatment selection by PMTs in public infrastructure projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Project Organization Journal
Engineering Project Organization Journal Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信