Evaluating Small vs. Large Power Blocks for Pipeline Compression Stations

This paper discusses how the application of large, gas turbine-based power blocks (>50,000-hp) in pipeline compression stations can contribute to lower capital costs, improved lifecycle performance, and reduced carbon emissions. For illustrative purposes, two compression facility power block configurations (nine 30,0000-hp trains vs. five 55,000-hp trains) are compared on the basis of capital expenditures (CapEx), operating expenditures (OpEx), availability, efficiency, and operating flexibility. A summary of the study's results are as follows: – Net present value (NPV) analyses show that 5x55,000-hp ISO trains can result in up to $50 million reduction in CAPEX vs 9x30,000-hp ISO trains – By having fewer trains, operations & maintenance (O&M) costs can be reduced by as much as 20% – Lifetime fuel savings with a 5x55,000-hp train configuration vs. 9x30,000-hp trains are estimated at $40 million, owing to the increased operating flexibility of modern gas turbines, even at partial loads. The paper will also present considerations for digitalization, modular construction, and package integration – with a particular focus on how these measures can be leveraged to lower execution risk and enhance the lifecycle performance of gas turbine-driven compression trains.