这到底是谁的愿景?中国国家媒体中的“自由互联网”

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1177/1868102621998084

Stefan Brehm

{"title":"这到底是谁的愿景?中国国家媒体中的“自由互联网”","authors":"Stefan Brehm","doi":"10.1177/1868102621998084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to explain how Chinese state media bolster the use of visions in global internet governance. The empirical data for the article consist of 1,158 internet-related articles published in the Global Times between 2009 and 2018. I develop a theoretical perspective that distinguishes between grand and strategic narratives. Based on a mixed-methods approach, I show that “internet sovereignty” has qualified as a grand narrative since the second half of 2013. State media facilitate this shift with strategic narratives that push the content and context of “internet sovereignty” from domestic political rationales towards a matter of global affairs. The article contributes to theoretical and methodological advancement in textual analysis.","PeriodicalId":37907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs","volume":"28 5 1","pages":"12 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose Vision Is It Anyway? The “Free Internet” in Chinese State Media\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Brehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1868102621998084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study seeks to explain how Chinese state media bolster the use of visions in global internet governance. The empirical data for the article consist of 1,158 internet-related articles published in the Global Times between 2009 and 2018. I develop a theoretical perspective that distinguishes between grand and strategic narratives. Based on a mixed-methods approach, I show that “internet sovereignty” has qualified as a grand narrative since the second half of 2013. State media facilitate this shift with strategic narratives that push the content and context of “internet sovereignty” from domestic political rationales towards a matter of global affairs. The article contributes to theoretical and methodological advancement in textual analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs\",\"volume\":\"28 5 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102621998084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102621998084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在解释中国官方媒体如何在全球互联网治理中促进愿景的使用。本文的实证数据包括2009年至2018年间《环球时报》发表的1158篇与互联网相关的文章。我发展了一个区分宏大叙事和战略叙事的理论视角。基于一种混合方法，我表明，自2013年下半年以来，“互联网主权”已经有资格成为一个宏大的叙事。官方媒体通过战略性叙述促进了这一转变，将“互联网主权”的内容和背景从国内政治理由推向全球事务。这篇文章对文本分析的理论和方法的进步做出了贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Whose Vision Is It Anyway? The “Free Internet” in Chinese State Media

This study seeks to explain how Chinese state media bolster the use of visions in global internet governance. The empirical data for the article consist of 1,158 internet-related articles published in the Global Times between 2009 and 2018. I develop a theoretical perspective that distinguishes between grand and strategic narratives. Based on a mixed-methods approach, I show that “internet sovereignty” has qualified as a grand narrative since the second half of 2013. State media facilitate this shift with strategic narratives that push the content and context of “internet sovereignty” from domestic political rationales towards a matter of global affairs. The article contributes to theoretical and methodological advancement in textual analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

7 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is an internationally refereed academic journal published by the GIGA Institute of Asian Studies, Hamburg. The journal focuses on current developments in Greater China. It is simultaneously published (three times per year) online as an Open Access journal and as a printed version with a circulation of 1,000 copies, making it one of the world’s most widely read periodicals on Asian affairs. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, unlike some other Open Access publications, does not charge its authors any fee. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs reaches a broad international readership in academia, administration and business circles. It is devoted to the transfer of scholarly insights to a wide audience. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research on current issues in China in a format and style that is accessible across disciplines and to professionals with an interest in the region. The editors welcome contributions on current affairs within Greater China, including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Submissions can focus on emerging topics and current developments as well as on future-oriented debates in the fields of China''s global and regional roles; political, economic and social developments including foreign affairs, business, finance, cultural industries, religion, education, science and technology; and so on.