当然了

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q2 HISTORY

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Pub Date : 2017-06-22 DOI:10.1163/15718190-08512P08

Aleksander Grebieniow

{"title":"当然了","authors":"Aleksander Grebieniow","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08512P08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mediaeval interpreters of Roman law have worked out the dolus re ipsa-concept to explain the mysterious laesio enormis (C. 4.44.2 [a. 285]). The inequality in exchange has been supposed then to be a result of malicious undertaking, for which paradoxically, no one was personally liable (Ulp. 45 ad Sab. D. 45.1.36). In course of time, the incorporation of laesio enormis into the scheme of dolus turned into a presumption of a malicious act on the part of the enriched party, even though, the laesio enormis is free from subjective criteria. It is astonishing how little the dolus re ipsa is discussed, although the modern paradigm for correcting inequality in exchange is based on same assumptions. This ‘Wiederkehr der Rechtsfigur’ certainly deserves more attention.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"148 1","pages":"192-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Die laesio enormis und der dolus re ipsa heute: die Verschuldensfrage\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander Grebieniow\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-08512P08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mediaeval interpreters of Roman law have worked out the dolus re ipsa-concept to explain the mysterious laesio enormis (C. 4.44.2 [a. 285]). The inequality in exchange has been supposed then to be a result of malicious undertaking, for which paradoxically, no one was personally liable (Ulp. 45 ad Sab. D. 45.1.36). In course of time, the incorporation of laesio enormis into the scheme of dolus turned into a presumption of a malicious act on the part of the enriched party, even though, the laesio enormis is free from subjective criteria. It is astonishing how little the dolus re ipsa is discussed, although the modern paradigm for correcting inequality in exchange is based on same assumptions. This ‘Wiederkehr der Rechtsfigur’ certainly deserves more attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"192-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P08\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

中世纪的罗马法诠释者已经提出了“不存在”的概念来解释神秘的“巨大法”(C. 4.44.2)。285])。交换中的不平等被认为是恶意行为的结果，矛盾的是，没有人为此承担个人责任(Ulp. 45和Sab。d . 45.1.36)。随着时间的推移，将“巨罪”纳入赔偿方案，虽然“巨罪”不存在主观标准，但已经变成了对被加害者恶意行为的推定。令人惊讶的是，尽管纠正交换不平等的现代范式也是基于同样的假设，但人们对逆差的讨论却少之又少。这一“研究数据”当然值得更多关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Die laesio enormis und der dolus re ipsa heute: die Verschuldensfrage

The mediaeval interpreters of Roman law have worked out the dolus re ipsa-concept to explain the mysterious laesio enormis (C. 4.44.2 [a. 285]). The inequality in exchange has been supposed then to be a result of malicious undertaking, for which paradoxically, no one was personally liable (Ulp. 45 ad Sab. D. 45.1.36). In course of time, the incorporation of laesio enormis into the scheme of dolus turned into a presumption of a malicious act on the part of the enriched party, even though, the laesio enormis is free from subjective criteria. It is astonishing how little the dolus re ipsa is discussed, although the modern paradigm for correcting inequality in exchange is based on same assumptions. This ‘Wiederkehr der Rechtsfigur’ certainly deserves more attention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.